Monthly Archives: December 2013

JAPANESE INCENSE SAMPLING IN TOKYO.

Image

 

 

IMG_9333

 

 

 

There is no doubt in my mind that Japanese incense, an ancient tradition that continues unabated to this day, is of a quality and beauty that surpasses all others. We are not talking ‘joss sticks’, of the inexpensive sandalwood incense used in Chinese temples, or the ‘Lotus Love’, thickly pasted cheap Indian incense on sale at music festivals. No. We are talking here about mysterious, beautiful, almost eerily emotive incense that rises up, beguilingly, in austere, religious smoke: in temples, from houses; a curious, ghostly vapour that is both spiritually calming and sensual: kyara/jinko (agarwood), sandalwood, cloves, benzoin,  cinnamon, rose, camphor, patchouli, osmanthus, hinoki…..all in various combinations, proportions and recipes, boxes of incense arranged in Buddhist shops for the peruser’s inspection. Usually, one is forced to lift up the box, and mess with the carefully wrapped boxes (which can cost up to 20, 000 yen (200 dollars), in order to smell the contents, but I was pleased to see, in a shop in Tokyo yesterday, that the many kinds of incense available, many of which I am familiar with and use myself on a daily basis, were available to be tested in small containers that held a few broken sticks; enough to get a good idea of what the smell of each variety will be like.

 

In truth, many incenses smell quite different when lit; some are even more beautiful, others too harsh and ‘smokey’. Neverthless, I did think that this sampling method was useful, and I wish that more incense shops did the same.

You can read more about Japanese incense below in my post on Zen. I will also be going to Kyoto over Christmas, which has some truly stunning incense shops, some, such as the beautiful Kungyokudo, which have been blending and making hand-made incense for centuries. I will write a more detailed report then.

 

In the meantime I ‘m interested to know though: have any of you ever used Japanese incense? If you haven’t, you don’t know what you are missing.

35 Comments

Filed under Flowers

EQUILIBRIUM : SPICED CITRUS VETIVER by SONOMA SCENT STUDIO (2013)

Leave a comment

Filed under Flowers

Waking in winter: EAU D’HIVER by EDITIONS DE PARFUMS (2003)

Leave a comment

Filed under Flowers

Oh, you old devil you………LA FIN DU MONDE by ETAT LIBRE D’ORANGE (2013); D’HUMEUR MASSACRANTE by L’ARTISAN PARFUMEUR (1998); + SULPHUR by NU-BE (2013)))

Image

 

 

 

Image

 

 

 

I watched too many horror movies as a child.  I did. And while I credit the terror that those brilliant products of the seventies and eighties engendered in me with helping to give me a rather unchained, lurid, and vivid imagination, the searing, mind-altering experience of seeing such petrifying films as Salem’s Lot; The Exorcist; and The Omen I + II with my younger brother, both of us scared beyond witless and hysterical and unable to sleep (our father barking at us even more terrifyingly to GET TO SLEEP) has given me not only a subliminal fear of crows and their eye-pocket-pecking potential (for life), but also left me with a profound fear of anything devilish, evil, or satanic; not even funny:  not even in jest. The topic is one I quite simply fear to touch –  exposing perhaps, a conservative side of myself on The Black Narcissus, that I am yet to fully, (and will never, probably) explore.

Duncan brought home a copy of Thomas Mann’s Doctor Faustus the other day, a masterpiece of European literature by all accounts that I am dipping into with definite fascination,  but also a certain trepidation, with its tales of artistic genius and pacts with the Dark One, particularly since some Italian friends of ours the other night suggested, in all seriousness, that Lady Gaga, who I am going through an absurd thing with in these last few weeks, might actually be a satanic force ( and I have been POSSESSED; still am:  by her latest, and brilliant, album ARTPOP).

To me, while I took this all –  discussed over dinner in a pasta restaurant in the north of Tokyo –  with a certain bunch of salt, they were, as I say, genuinely in earnest; and they are both, in any case, fearfully intelligent types; fingers really on the various pulses (so oops there goes my innocent pleasure….)

While deep down inside I think that Stefania Germanotta is probably more of an angel to be honest: more an angel, certainly, than the devil’s hand maiden; I have to admit, embarrassingly, that nonetheless, some fearful, infernal seeds have still been sown:  unwantedly, and a bit frighteningly,  in my brain.

I know that I do have a strongly mischievous and contrarian side to my nature, I am naughty, quite rude, and a bit saucy; and I do truly hate the hypocritically pious, and the ‘holy’, and the whole of right wing America, and of England, who are obviously way more aligned with Satan, if he exists, than Lady Gaga, (isn’t advanced capitalism, in some ways, the devils’ work?): but there is nothing remotely, actually, (surely!!! surely…. tell me!) devilish about me I like, naively to believe…….. ( is there?!!)

 

And though I am highly attracted, still, and always, to the lavish baroque ridiculousness of the luxuriant vampire, that whole world  (of Andy Warhol/Paul Morrissey’s exquisite Blood For Dracula; of Francis Ford Coppola’s Bram Stoker’s Dracula, to name but a few-  a pile of ludicrous, luscious nonsense from 1993 that, as any friends of the time will attest sent me into total rapture when I was at university; saw me speaking in a Transylvanian accent for two weeks after, despite what anybody thought), I am never drawn, ever, I don’t think, to anything genuinely evil. This may seem like stating the obvious, but I have known people who have flirted with such things; and I am always, myself,  deeply wary of even approaching these dark, nether regions of cosmology that may, or may not, truly exist. You will never catch me within even a mile of a oujia board; oh no siree (though if someone close to me died, who knows?……….)

 

In any case, today’s admittedly weird post (come on, it is the end of a long term) might seem like an odd choice for a perfume review, especially during this spiritual (in theory) festive season in the run up to Christmas, but I have just in fact received samples of two perfumes, fun little things, actually,  that touch on the very themes I have been superficially elaborating on right here; one, the great sulfurous, Luciferian abyss that mankind has (rightfully?) feared for millennia; and the other, the actual, tectonic shaking end of humanity itself.

 

 

In truth, if you were to smell either of these new scents blind, images of destruction, annihilation, or of almost any form of malevolence would almost definitely not surface, particularly in the case of the cloud-fluffily floss-minx that is Fin Du Monde; which, like Divin Enfant, another supposedly devilish scent from this deceptively rule-breaking enterprise, is definitively all bark and no bite. Sulfur, however, a fine new perfume by Italian outfit Nu-Be, whose seven current perfumes are all conceptually based on the periodic table, does have a certain, hot-spiced Mephistophelian spike in its tail. A person leaning over you at some restaurant, or at a club, or even on a train, wearing this scent: nonchalantly, blatantly: might be really, physically, or just intensively, rather irresistible.

 

 

 

This is what Etat Libre D’Orange has to say about their latest perfume….

 

 

“Etat Libre d’Orange presents the end of the world.

Okay, we know what you’re thinking.  Been there, done that, bought the t-shirt.  You’ve heard the ominous warnings, the dire threats.  You know all about the cults, the cataclysmic visions, the Armageddon battle.  You’ve endured the panic of the Millenium and the Mayan prophesy, you’ve read about the End Times and the Rapture.

And you’ve actually seen it!  Yes, we’ve all witnessed the end of the world, in one or more of its possible manifestations.   Maybe you remember the look of horror on the face of Charlton Heston, when he realizes that this savage planet dominated by apes was actually good ol’ Earth.  You might have seen Slim Pickens as aircraft commander Major T.J. ‘King’ Kong, who straddles the bomb like a cowboy and rides it to the ground, thereby setting off the Doomsday Machine.  Or Will Smith, running from the virus-mutants, the only survivors of a plague.  You gaped at the two sisters and a child, huddled together in a teepee as the blue planet Melancholia hurtles toward earth, and you watched how a variety of Canadians observe the last night on earth – praying, partying, finally achieving an orgasm.

And maybe you screamed when that giant hand came crashing up through the cabin in the woods as the ancient gods reclaimed earth….

Natural disasters, man-made catastrophes, plagues and religions and nuclear bombs – so many options!  And as the world comes to an end, we shudder and shriek and weep and maybe even laugh (Dr. Strangelove!) – from the comfort of our plush seats in the dark movie theaters………

But now we know what the end of the world might look like.  And we know how it will smell.

Like popcorn. “

 

 

 

 

You know, I actually kind of love this.

So conceptual! So playful, so hilariously Dada-esque; the end of the world being reduced to the scent of popcorn, which this perfume doesn’t exactly smell of, but which is about as equally threatening. I do kind of love this tongue-in-cheek total silliness. And La Fin Du Monde is, in fact, very typical of this perfume house: a fun, and in some ways quite daring, enterprise whose perfumes I often like, but which I also find quite thin and overly similar to each other, usually, once I have overridden the thematic pleasure that the always amusing copy engenders (essential to this house’s enjoyment; without the story dreamed up for each scent I honestly don’t think there would be very much there at all to get excited about: but here, plugging right into the Chapman heartstrings, they even blatanly reference one of my very favourite films from last year – Melancholia by Lars Von Trier…….they really covered all the bases with their cinematic end-of-worlds here….)

 

This latest release – cute, playful, pliant, kind of typical – is a sweet, gourmandish, iris/carrot seed/ambrette number with curious top notes of cumin, sesame and popcorn (and, apparently, though don’t necessarily believe it –  gunpowder) that goes from a irisian, papery, and peppery, pleasant initial freshness, to a more vanillic, sugary and sensual ending of sandalwood, vetiver, and styrax that you have, in some ways, smelled before.  It lingers, and finally even emotes, (empathy for those hyperventliating heroines trying to escape on the big silver screen?), quite nicely, if a touch weirdly. It has character, certainly, and that is definitely something. In the long run of things, however, I would say that La Fin Du Monde, a name for a perfume that should surely command respect, a reaction, or at least something, something EPIC, is most definitely a case, unfortunately, of (rebellious, audaciously, gallic) sugar-spun style over real substance.

 

 

 

Sulfur

“represents the demonic spirit, the darkness. A juice coming from the shadows, a satanic elixir… ……notes revealing the bowels of the earth………nothing is pure, a fragrance evoking hellish potions: warm spicy accord of pimento, cinnamon and black angelica . Earthy and root notes of vetiver, patchouli and moss. Animalic character of costus and castoreum………. And deep resins like opoponax and myrrh.”

 

I must say, actually, that this perfume is pretty good.  It is a  taut and masculine composition, modern but classic, that makes me feel as though Tom Ford’s Grey Vetiver had suddenly ripped off his tailored suit, his overly manicured attitude, and, for reasons, not yet disclosed, instinctively got low down and funky in some back room…….the opening a nose-tingling miasma of reddish elements that does in fact capture some feeling of heat and of volcanic-ness (this comes by no means from the bowels of the earth I would say, though – not that I have been there….), but, definitely,  more enclosed and tingling than the usual………

What it does indubitably evade is a certain thinness that I hate in many recent perfumes. While there is none of the musky plenitude of the eighties’ machos, those Ungaros, Tsars, Kouroses and the like, those perfumes that bent from the neck, from the chest, and announced themselves unbearably (so wonderfully!) in your face, there is still a tightness here; a bound-together, spiced and turned up woodiness that is dry, feisty, a touch troubled; quite sensual.

When it comes to sulphur, though, the natural smell of which I despise, especially when it comes in the guise of the bubbling, helliciously eggy spouts of steam that rise up from Japanese hot springs, I am very glad, to be honest,  that the perfume in question today does not actually smell of this substance  (Who would actually want to smell of sulphur?). Though in truth I do have another ‘angry’ scent like this in my collection, actually, the tinder-dry D’Humeur Massacrante from L’Artisan, a limited edition from back in the day that likewise played on a sulphurous theme; the heat of a match being struck, an incandescent moment of fury. That also has pimiento, and pepper, and other fiery substances, particularly an overdose of nutmeg, and it kind of, I have to say, makes Sulfur seem a bit of a pussy in comparison.

On the other hand, Massacrante (I always loved that name! A perfume to massacre people by!) was meant as a mood diffuser, as part of the Sautes D’Humeur collection that also starred perhaps the greenest perfume ever made, the stinging-nettle laden D’Humeur Jalouse, as well as the girliest; the little girls’ nails and puppy dog’s tails pinkness of the hilarious D’Humeur A Rire.

These scents were never really intended as fully fledged, orchestrated perfumes anyway; they were designed, more I think, as little excerpts to break up your day, to accentuate or else get rid of a certain mood. Massacrante is great, undoubtedly, but has a certain two-dimensionality. Sulfur is more rounded; gets deeper, and more resinous and impressive as it goes on, increasing in horniness,  smooth-tonguedness and well-rehearsed, urban-seductive techniques as the hours, slowly in your purgatory of boredom, waiting for this horndog to arrive……. pass.

 

Nu-be’s (what kind of name is that, incidentally?) ‘Sulfur’ is not really supposed to represent the devil, then, I am happy to say; but, like the about-to-go-out-person wrapped up in furs and defiant last-minute squirts of Etat’s Fin Du Monde, with its later, more suggestive notes that linger more than you might expect from that jazzy, easier-than-thou opening, this perfume, in its arid truculence, its sly elegance and vetiver assertion is, undeniably, despite a lack of any real originality or transgression, really, actually,  kind of devilishly sexy.

18 Comments

Filed under Flowers

POUDRE DE RIZ by HUITIEME ART (2012)

Leave a comment

Filed under Flowers

THE SPIRIT OF PARIS: FOUR PERFUMES BY CARON / French Can Can (1936): Montaigne (1986): Farnésiana (1947): Tabac Blond (1919)

just because

Leave a comment

Filed under Flowers

the mountain moonlight, and roses…..TAUER PERFUMES’ INCENSE ROSE (2008) + UNE ROSE DE KANDAHAR (2013)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image

 

 

 

 

 

 

The very existence of an innovative and imaginative independent perfumer such as Zurich based Andy Tauer, an alchemist who produces strange and unique perfumes within his own apartment and boxes them, packages them, and sends them to his eager recipients all over the world, is quite gratifying in this overly compromised and commercialized world of vacuous, olfactory pap. Tauer’s releases regularly get the fragrant stratosphere all lathered up; stark, strong, and very contemporary blends that defy the usual gender-seductive expectations and take perfumery into interesting, and unidentified, zones.

 

They are not to be taken lightly, however. For me personally, Tauer scents are never an easy wear. Rather than just an immediately pleasing smell to apply, to fuse with and merely enhance my own physical aura and persona, these very complex (very male, actually) perfumes feel more like miniature, fully realized tableaux or skin-inhabiting theatrical productions; dramatic plays or ballets taking part on my skin, curious circumstances where all I can do is stand back and watch. Creations such as Reverie Au Jardin, a lavender-based, iridescent soap bubble fantasy that could easily have been directed by Peter Jackson; or the bizarre orchestrations of the fantastical, compellingly vivacious Vetiver Dance, these are scents from which I feel disembodied but simultaneously magnetized.

 

I did in fact once buy a full bottle of a Tauer, though, in London at Les Senteurs: the fabled, and much lauded, L’Air Du Désert Marocain, thinking it would be good for Duncan. How mistaken I was. We both loathed how it smelled on him, in its undiminishing, almost acrid intensity (and I would never even consider for a second wearing a stark, woody arid: probably the last category in the world I would wear – give me unscented instead, I just can’t do it). There was a relentlessness there, and, ironically, a total absence of air in that perfume that made for quite an unpleasant experience. So off was sent the bottle to my brother, who apparently wore it so well, and so naturally, that he was constantly followed about and complimented wherever he went, all the time, by strangers, by both women and men, trails of spices and resins surrounding the air perfectly matched to his skin chemistry (drier, more top-note centric than my own base-note enslaving canvas). He always wears fragrance, but has never had quite this reaction before or since. I would have really loved to have experienced how it smelled on Greg, actually, but by the time I got to England, the bottle had long been drained and he was asking for another (at that price, fat chance, mate).

 

 

 

Which brings me to today’s focus: two vehement, opulent, East-inspired roses. Before we begin, though, I must ask the question: am I even qualified to review these perfumes knowing full well in advance that they are very likely to be too fortified for me; that there is something in Andy Tauer’s perfumes that, quite honestly, usually just make me shudder?  (Am I alone in this, incidentally?)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But let’s see. Let’s go closer. Let’s smell them anyway. Just because we want to, and because we love incense, and we love roses, and because one simply cannot ignore a perfume which has the name Une Rose De Kandahar.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image

 

 

 

 

 

 

First, to Incense Rose. I have had several samples of this scent, which in my view has an effortless integration of freshness (cardamom, clementine, bergamot, Texan cedarwood and a light Bulgarian rose), and a subtle, insidious mysticism, melded cleverly as it is with a fervent, long-lasting oriental bedding of labdanum, myrrh, patchouli, and ambergris that supports the starring ingredient in this perfume; a deep, smouldering frankincense. A spiced, lingering tapestry, quite beautiful in its linear night sky; a wise agelessness of orientalist, expanded canvas in the base; an incense scent (if you love incense scents) that you can trust; that just lasts and lasts and lasts (and lasts) throughout the day. I do rather rate this perfume, actually, and have used it to scent the house (it smells great on curtains in winter), but these parched, ascetic scents, I have to say, ultimately, just aren’t me.

 

 

 

 

Une Rose De Kandahar, a new, (kind of) limited edition perfume, is founded upon a rare and special rose essence produced in the prime rose growing region in Afghanistan of Nangarhar, and consequently, (and beautifully, for me, ) constant availability of this perfume cannot be guaranteed. I am a real sucker for this kind of story; I love the idea of terroir-specific natural essences (especialy somewhere as poignantly fierce and unyielding as this fascinating country) and in fact, compared to the drier, more masculine Incense Rose, Une Rose De Kandahar is really much more about the rose flower itself; plush, rounded, feminine, bolstered with gentle, almost gourmandish notes of almond and apricot; a pleasingly sweetish blend of tobacco leaf and cinnamon-touched Nangahar and Bulgarian roses, over warm, almost ambery, notes of patchouli, vetiver, vanilla, tonka bean and musk.

 

 

The first stage of the perfume is a forbidden, sensualized kiss of this quite beautiful rose, quite intense and yearning : very emotional.  If you are a rose lover, and enjoy the scent of rose otto, of the natural essential oil, then I would definitely recommmend Une Rose De Kandahar. Unconscious perceptions of dusted cinnamon apricots over a soft, blouseful bloom of innocent, light pink roses, make for a scent I find somehow quite beautiful, if slightly too wide-eyed in sincerity. The scent is never overblown, but even so, rather than the soft, vanillic ending I would have been hoping for (because, obviously, I just would), instead, the usual Tauerade woodiness, some incense (some oudh? Some frankincense? ) rises up through the rosed, ambery pillow, eventually, and presents something….I don’t know. Unwanted. For me at least.

 

 

Is this incensey ending, as insistent as that central note in Incense Rose, even though it is imperceptible at the beginning, the natural ending for this perfume? Is it even warranted? I first put this perfume on about nine hours ago, and this sinewy incense is still going strong as I write this,  even though all traces of roses, of softness, of what the perfume was initially, have long disappeared.

 

 

 

Mmmm. Incense Rose and Une Rose De Kandahar. I couldn’t wear either of these personally, of that I am quite sure, in the same way that I would never wear yellow, russet, beige, or brown. I just never would. Some colours just don’t suit me. And yet, despite my own slight aversion to these scents on a certain plane of consciousness, to be sat somewhere next to a man or woman in Incense Rose, or Une Rose De Kandahar, both quite riveting and rapturous perfume in many ways, I can honestly imagine being almost hypnotized. What does this mean?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image

 

 

 

 

With thanks, as always, to the lovely Bethan for the samples. I never take it for granted. x

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16 Comments

Filed under Flowers

BOOBS………………….Le N° 9 by CADOLLE (1925)

Leave a comment

Filed under Flowers

SEXING THE CHERRY: LOUVE by SERGE LUTENS (2007)

Leave a comment

Filed under Flowers

What have they done to Serge Lutens’ Daim Blond? (2004)

 

 

 

Image

 

 

When my sister came to stay with us in Berlin two years ago, she was clad, beautifully, in Daim Blond: a fuzzy, apricot-led nuzzle of suede that surrounded her, elegantly, like a warm, sunlit halo. Top notes of hawthorn and iris were wedded, velvetly, urbanely, and suggestively, to spiced, ambered, heliotropic effects that had a real, three dimensional dust-mote texture (the actual imagined olfactory texture of suede; blonde suede, the name of this most successful, in commercial terms, of the Lutens range).

 

I bought a new bottle of Daim Blond for her yesterday at Shinjuku Isetan, Tokyo, as this is a perfume she likes to go back to, and which she has been getting a lot of compliments on. But I should have trusted my nose before I reached into my wallet. Strangely, I thought the version in the tester I sprayed seemed thinner, less lush and smooth than the one I knew somehow, and I really knew that version because it filled our apartment deliciously for the entirety of those days that Deborah was staying with us; I also surreptiously sprayed a whole load of the perfume inside a CD cover as a remembrance, something I often do with perfumes that strike me as meaningful in some way and that I want to lock in place in my mind, and it was so thick and perfumed, so reeking of that time that we were hanging out in Berlin bars and clubs all night and of the brunches we were having all the days after, that the case still smells of it.

 

I stupidly handed over the yen anyway, I suppose, because I thought that it might have just been my imagination – anosmic from all the things I had been smelling and thus not able to properly judge – and also because I need to be getting on quite soon with the family Christmas presents. But I should have trusted my instincts. Naughtily, I have just opened this ‘Daim Blond’ just to check, to be sure, before sending it off to England, and I am quite sure that this is not the same perfume. Yes, the base is the same lovely suede, and I hope she will still get a kick from that stage of this scent. But all the ripe fullness of the perfume that I remember has gone. There is no apricot, no hawthorn: people, this perfume has been stripped.

 

Perhaps I am naive to be so surprised. Exactly the same thing happened to my beloved Un Bois De Vanille, which was also shaved and defluffed, all its creamy, wispy pink coconut top clouds skimmed, knived off and replaced with harder, less dreamy, woods; and also the great Ambre Sultan, which is just nowhere near as strong and extravagantly gorgeous, as ambered, basically, as it was when it was first released (when it was almost embarrassingly opulent and strong to wear out in public). Yes, I know all the crap about IFRA and all the regulations and everything, but this is embarrassing. It cost too much to not send, I can’t take it back now I have opened it, and yet I feel I am sending my sister something second rate. I can see her expression on Christmas Day when she puts it on, a quizzical look on her face as she tries to mentally compute what is wrong, why it isn’t ringing quite the same bells. No, I don’t know the reasons for this reformulation. But I do know that it seriously pisses me off.

 

 

 

 

31 Comments

Filed under Flowers