Monthly Archives: February 2014

CAN ONE TRANSFER A MEMORY? ARMANI EAU POUR HOMME (1984)

 

 

Image

 

 

 

 

 

Armani Eau Pour Homme was my first perfume major perfume love. Though Xeryus by Givenchy takes the honour as the very first scent I ever saved up for and bought by myself, it was only the top notes that I loved in that grey, onyx masculine (and the fact that it got me such attention….I can still see the girls at school stopping in the corridors at fifteen and nuzzling up to my neck……what power is this thought I…...)

 

 

The taut and scintillating top accord in Xeryus of grapefruit, artemisa and cypress that had so captivated me soon warmed and wavered, however, into a soapy, and too manly, fougère that despite what the young ladies might have thought, just wasn’t entirely what the doctor ordered. I never felt entirely comfortable in its embrace despite the pleasure that certain aspects of the fragrance gave me, that sense of sharp, diffracted light glinting on granite……

 

 

My interested ignited, I kept looking and smelling, but it wasn’t until I discovered Armani, at the local chemist’s on Dovehouse Parade (the joy of expensive, out-of-shoplifter-reach perfumes being locked up in glass cases behind the counter, and the intrepid asking of the bemused assistants if you could smell them!) that I found a bottle of perfume that I fully adored, for quite a few years actually, getting bottles for birthdays and Christmas presents and purposefully building up the charisma around what I had already firmly decided would be my signature.  

 

 

 

What drew me to Armani, beside the lovely magazine advert you see above –  so much more appealing to me than the muscular absurdity of all the Antaeuses and the Drakkars and the Azzaros –  was its stunningly beautiful opening accord of brisk, refreshing citruses, that contained, compressedly, all the zap, vivacity and optimism of a brand new day in April;  sharp, clean, lime, twisted cleverly with freshly picked mandarin and basil leaves long before Jo Malone ever had the thought, cleverly laced delicately over a gentle heart of lavender, lemon, and clove. Delightful. I remember that every time I sprayed on this scent my budding teenage self would experience a spurt of ecstacy, and it is in this experience, of first perfume love, that the seeds of my current scent-obsessed self lie. Wearing this beautifully made, ‘designer fragrance’ was so exciting to me I would race around to Helen’s house after school, or on weekend mornings, proffer up my wrists; she would be there already smelling beautiful in her Yves Saint Laurent Paris, and we would listen to Prince with the windows open wide onto her garden; lounge about; talk pompously, and dream.

 

 

 

Yes, Armani was most definitely my signature for quite a while, but there has always been a tendency for people to commandeer another person’s scent when they like how it smells (and why not? It is a very sincere form of flattery), and true enough, soon, my friend Owen, who lived on the same block, decided that he, too, wanted to wear Armani. Begrudgingly, I had to let him do it. And then,  to my great horror, I soon realized that it smelled so much better on him, so much smoother and angelic (the perfumer, Roger Pellegrino, also created the incomparable Anaïs Anaïs to give you an idea of its pedigree), and suddenly I felt that I just couldn’t justify wearing it any more. I have very base-heavy skin that always brings out the oakmoss and sandalwood in the final stages of perfumes while eating up and spitting out the top notes, and it was this stage that I had always been far less keen on in Armani (though I think I had never entirely admitted that to myself). It was certainly the reason, however, that I had to keep respritzing the scent to keep that lime and mandarin fresh until l discovered, eventually, the baume après rasage, which, with its creamier, more balsamic aspects, kept the snowy lemons and petitgrain, but did away with all the vieux beau base notes, wrapping up all the dapper citruses in the white draping sheets they use to cover museum statues, pointing me in the process towards the more vanillic orientals I was later to fully claim as my own.

 

 

 

On Owen Armani smelled perfect, and the smell of it became inextricable from him and his clean white shirts for years and years, my own self-associations quickly fading as I latched onto other perfumes that seemed to enliven my essence much more than that one had. By chance, we actually got back in touch again a couple of years ago after a long absence of contact, and funnily enough, he asked me if there were any scents that came anywhere close to capturing the atmosphere of Armani, which he still retained a lot of affection for. To his great satisfaction, I pointed him immediately in the direction of Armani Privé’s more expensive, but very similar Oranger d’Alhambra, which is clearly based on the original Armani but with even more delicious and more expensive smelling top notes (the beginning of that scent is to die for if you are a citrus enthusiast). It is a better fragrance in some ways I would say, Eau Pour Homme’s natural evolutionary progression. Nevertheless, I still retain great affection for the original Armani –  as you will always do for any first love – and when I found a full, boxed, vintage 100ml bottle recently at a Japanese thrift store, I naturally couldn’t help buying it.

 

 

 

It smells exactly as I remember it: crisp, fresh, the smell of a beautifully pure and elegant young man, and I simply can’t pull it off. It smells muddy and muddled on my 43 year old skin, the citruses quickly subsumed by that classic oakmoss that I never really liked, and so it has just been sitting in its box until I wondered, the other day on a whim, if it might not suit Duncan. The narcissistic implications of this aside, he does usually carry off the cologne type of fragrance very nicely, and though he initially brushed off the suggestion with a ‘Oh no, that one’s boring, isn’t it?’, once seduced by the lime (he loves lime) he sprayed and sprayed away and smelled really quite gorgeous in it. All day in Yokohama on Monday, a beautiful, unseasonably warm spring day (balmy and 19ºC; the next day it went down to minus 2 and snowed), the trail of scent he was drifting sophisticatedly and non-intrusively behind him was most pleasing. It did remind me of Owen, a bit, but was different; warmer, more aromatic, more whole.  Owen made that scent almost too morally blameless somehow, a celestial, lemonic ‘odour of sanctity’ that while quite enviable, was also, naturally, part of its charm on him. Still, that intense ‘aroma of integrity’ did occasionally get on my wick, even when I fully admit that he wore it better. On me there was always some kind of dissonance. Finally, with Duncan, though, if I can persuade him to make it a staple, with its ideal balancing of citrus and lightly spiced vetiver and oakmoss, its perfect encapsulation of a certain kind of unaggressive masculinity, I think that my first love, Armani Eau Pour Homme, may have found a new home.

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

I was wondering also if you have had similar experiences. I am interested in your own stories of ‘fragrance plagiarism’; of someone, a sibling, your best friend, ‘stealing’ your scent (as my brother and father did with Kouros, though I know for a FACT that I wear that one better…..grrrr);  or else realizing, to your great dismay, as I did, that another person simply wore a perfume so much better that you just had to throw in the towel and give it up.  

 

 

Also, do you think that once associations around a person have formed with a scent that it is possible for them to be transferred completely to another, or will there always be some deeper, subconscious confusion? Is it selfish and narcissistic to clasp these bottles so closely, so jealously, to our chests?

 

 

34 Comments

Filed under Flowers

‘American woman’ : RATTAN GARDENIA, IKAT JASMINE, EVENING ROSE, LILAC PATH & AMBER MUSK by AERIN (2013)

\Image

Image

I think am unusual among perfume lovers in having a true olfactory double life. The fact of living in Japan, in a culture where strong-smelling scents tend to be frowned upon, as well as working in an educational establishment where perfume is actually not allowed, has produced a schism:  at weekends, and during the long vacations I am fortunate enough to have with this job, the facial hair grows back (also banned in the workplace in case the students find it creepy), and the perfume gets hairier and more intense as well….out comes the Bal A Versailles, Tonka Impériale; the Lorenzo Villoresi Patchouli; Ungaro Pour Homme, the Montale Aouds, the rich vanillas and coconuts; vetivers, all the earthy, sensual scents I tend to favour, naturally, and uncensored, in my native, scent-reeking habitat.

Come the working week though, all that is put behind me. I shower, hard and long with the freshest smelling soaps, shampoos and conditioners, to remove every trace of all that from my body as I shave off the beard and become, again, my smiling, clean-living, English Gentleman alter ego.

I have two separate wardrobes, in different rooms of the house. Work clothes are confined in a kind of olfactive apartheid: unscented, clean-smelling, redolent, hopefully, of nothing more than fabric conditioner, or hints of the other, floral fresh fragrances I sometimes wear to circumvent the unbearable rules. Yes, I do wear perfume ( of course ). Not always, mind you. Recently there have been days when I have left the house completely unperfumed save for the gentle smell of Shiseido shampoo and hair mousse: I have even found it almost liberating in a sense (wow! is that the sky I can smell?!) realizing, suddenly, how the ‘normals’, those who don’t spend almost every moment of the day living through their noses, must feel: just blending, like odourless camouflage, into the backdrop of humdrum life. It is a weird feeling, to be sure, but once in a while to shed the scented mantle for a day or two can be refreshing. I also, then, feel far less paranoid in the workplace. You can’t imagine how stressful it is to have people wrinkling their noses or muttering under their breath, and, conversely, how pleasing it is to just have a bit of smell-security. Phew. Today it seems that I don’t stink.

I have written about this before on The Black Narcissus of course, but I am yet to come across anyone who has this experience to quite the extent that I do. I realize, naturally, that some of you reading this will also have to curtail your inner urges in the workplace so as not to offend your smell-sensitive colleagues, particularly in North America; the olfactively unconventional niche dramas of the perfumista not always readily accepted by one’s ignorant, smell-dunce co-workers. Here in Japan, however, the situation is undoubtedly far more severe. Mistakenly, in the long and distant past, thinking that a bit of citrus couldn’t hurt, surely, I have, on woeful and misguided occasion, worn Armani Pour Homme, Chanel Pour Monsieur, Miller Harris Citron Citron, Hermès Eau D’Orange Verte, among others, thinking I smelled crisp and gentlemanly only to hear the students muttering kusai, kusai (‘he stinks’) underneath their breaths as well as staff in the teachers’ room making straight and direct comments that such perfumes really just weren’t suitable. What I thought was lemon and lime, light; fresh; pleasing, to them is a stenchy old gaijin man of oakmoss, vetiver, and patchouli, the basenotes that inevitably rise up and fill up the space like a piggy, western animal, in the hallowed breath of the Japanese classroom. No, I long ago gave up even attempting to wear anything remotely masculine or classic, and as for orientals, you should have seen the kids when I once wore a bit (well, quite a bit, actually) of Givenchy Pi…  literally screaming for the windows to be opened. Horrible, sweat-inducing experiences I have no desire to repeat.

Well, maybe you just do actually smell naturally bad, you say (or just think privately) to yourself. Well who knows, maybe I do. Maybe such a terror is what drives many of us to wear perfume in the first place. And yet I have had the opposite extreme of reaction when I have broken the rules of the company and instead worn light doses of fresh, floral scents designed for women;  those unthreatening, exultantly clean perfumes which, worn on clean shirt sleeves and collars on a nice spring day strangely seem to suit me to a ‘t’:  Marc Jacobs, Summer by Kenzo, Champs Elysées, Antonia’s Flowers Floret, Pacifica Star Rock Jasmine, and particularly Clinique Happy worn in moderation have had girls following me down the corridors attesting to how gorgeous I smell, which is all rather interesting from a cultural and gender point of view, but also shows you what a weird predicament I find myself in. I would never wear any of these at the weekend, never ever ever it would feel like a peculiar kind of soul transvesticism; but I do think that in some ways I wear them just as well as I wear my orientals and more extreme perfumes – it is just a different side of my character. I like to smell good, basically, and have just had to adapt myself, chameleon-like, to whichever environment I happen to find myself in.

Which brings me to the new collection of perfumes by Aerin Lauder, grand-daughter of Estée and creative director of the gorgeous Private Collection Tuberose Gardenia, which my friend Cath sent me a sample of recently and which I also wore successfully to work, with its neroli-infused, heady but steady white florals nestling most pleasantly, gently tropical but still downily clean, beneath my shirt cuffs. These perfumes have no scary old lady musks; patchouli; or hidden animalics in their bases to frighten the Japanese; no, though often almost entirely synthetic, they seem designed to form perfect extensions of the freshly washed, fabric- softened aura that the modern American woman often seems to want, sometimes desperately it feels, to evince.

You will see, then I come to this new collection by Aerin Lauder from a somewhat twisted perspective: while I genuinely do love the smell of faultless, floral cleanliness, (which you know full well in advance that these perfumes are going to have), they also remind us of the limitations placed upon us: not just on me and the strange perfume Jekyll & Hyde I have become, but also on the perfume wearing public itself: that this flawless patina of airbrushed, fluid-banishing unbodiliness is now almost what is required of the American woman strikes me as disturbing as it is pleasant. Having said that, the new Aerin collection, as we will see, is in fact more human and pleasing than many such offerings, and does sometimes go beyond sheer tuberosed metallica into calmer, almost fleshed, warm and womanly sensuality.

GARDENIA RATTAN Notes:  Marine Accord, Tuberose, Gardenia, Tiare, Amber

Smelling this perfume reminded me instantly of last summer in Indonesia when we were caught in a rainstorm in the historical Kota district of Jakarta, by the river, standing under ripening, opening plumeria trees and watching the swollen grey clouds burst as market vendors scrambled to get somewhere under cover. Tropical white flowers and river ozone. If you are a fan of the original Marc Jacobs gardenia (as I am, in limited doses), you will probably like Gardenia Rattan. Like that perfume, this gardenia has a pronounced watery, ozonic top note that cuts through the florals and keeps them from ever getting too buttery and cloying, chiefly a very familiar gardenia/tuberose accord that is similar to the Jacobs though not quite as piquant or sharp: the wet note that clings throughout this perfume’s duration on the skin quite refreshing, I would imagine, on a hot, humid day, one of those commercially attractive perfumes I can see becoming a big hit. You couldn’t possibly get a safer fragrance, with its clean, beachy, feminine vibe, its total  skank-annihilating swathes of freshness, though I can imagine that even one spray too much of this in an office environment might be a touch headache-inducing.

IKAT JASMINE Notes: Jasmine sambac, Jasmine Egypt, Tuberose Fleur, Tuberose Infusion, Honeysuckle, Sandalwood

The thing about Ikat Jasmine is that it doesn’t really seem to contain any jasmine. Not in the usual manner we expect, at any rate, with that familiar, white, fleshy, indolic lusciousness. Far more prominent is a light, imaginary air-soaring honeysuckle, which graces the fresh floral accord and soft, shadowy musk-sandalwood base quite beautifully in a blend that I personally can’t help but find rather seductive. Like the jail-baiting Curious by Britney Spears and also Jean Charles Brosseau’s Violette Menthe, this perfume has that flirtatious insouciance of a devastingly sexy young thing, that moment when an inspired combination of ingredients somehow produces an entirely different kettle of fish; in this case, to me at any rate, a classroom scenario in which a dreamily beautiful girl is playing with her hair indolently, knowingly, and the scent that is moving deliberately, slowly, across that very room is driving the teenage boys that secretly love her, but don’t dare to admit it, wild. As I said, to me this is not a jasmine perfume, really, more a pleasingly dusky, abstract floral, but one that I just instinctively know on the right young thing could be the school’s best kept secret::::  What IS that perfume she is wearing? I need to know…..

EVENING ROSE Notes:   Blackberry, Cognac, Rose Centifolia, Rose Bulgaria, Incense, Amber.

If Ikat Jasmine is best kept for your niece or daughter as a coming-of-age birthday present, then Evening Rose will do very nicely for the more sexually experienced woman of the family. Here, Aerin veers from the starched, Caucasian ideal for a moment and audaciously (gasp!) embraces the Arab-American daringness of an attenuated rose-oudh, tackling the recent wave of oudh perfumes à la Kilian by reining in the more swoony, ambered and middle-eastern aspects of the perfume with a beautiful rose top note of quality, almost Elizabethan in its classicism, and light, fruited sensations of blackberry. It is an expertly blended perfume; warm, suggestive, rich, yet still gentle and unthreatening. While I personally like my oudhs and roses more full-on, this perfume treads the middle ground successfully, the kind of scent that could weave sensual webs of intrigue around the right wearer, garnering compliments from her more mainstream friends who will undoubtedly lean in closer and say ” I like your perfume. It’s unusual. ”

LILAC PATH Notes:   Lilac Flowers, Galbanum, ‘Creamy Jasmine Lactones’, Angelica Seed Oil, Orange Blossom

The problem with perfumes that smell like air-fresheners (and they are increasing in number by the day), is the sense of what they are concealing. While the British woman will ‘nip to the loo’, or even just simply tell you that she is ‘going to the toilet’, her US counterpart is not supposed to do such things. She slips off euphemistically to the ‘restroom’, to the ‘powder room’, obfuscating the biological realities of every human being and their requisite toilet function. All such realities are usually deleted with Lauder perfumes, which create the illusion of odorous sanctity, of laser-beamed, angelic unbodiedness.  Lilac Path goes too far, however. There is a great unspoken elephant with this perfume, and it is sitting right there in the toilet bowl…

I used to really hate cheap floral airfresheners as a child. In fact I used to scream sometimes as grotesque wafts of cheap Glade lilac would assail me from the family bathroom and reach me in my bedroom mixed with unmentionables: at any rate I almost preferred the disgusting, raw emissions of the human body to the blend that would instead meet my nose. And while there is nothing remotely dirty about Lilac Path (although I do think that lilacs are some of the very dirtiest smelling flowers, even when they have just bloomed), with its grassy, green tones gracing the neutered lilac blooms, the disturbing connotations of covering up are just personally way too strong for me.

Testing these perfumes for a third time last night, Duncan also thought this was as foul as I did – way too strong, for a start, and entirely unsuited for the skin of a human being. Though it eventually does die down to quite a nice, delicately polished lilac skin-scent, if you are after lilacs, if you must have lilacs, then I would recommend After My Own Heart by Ineke, which treats those flowers in a similar manner (but with better execution ); the original Pleasures by Estée Lauder with its wet, clear, feminine, lilacy insistence, or Olivia Giacobetti’s delicately poetic En Passant, (which I reviewed the other day); or, if you actually want to embrace what lilacs in fact really are, and are unafraid, then go for the full on, tongue-thwacking f***fest under the lilac bushes that is Fior Di Lilla by Borsari.

AMBER MUSK Notes:  Ambrox, Magnolia, Rose, Coconut Water, Benzoin, Musk

There There. That’s better.

Amber Musk, a gold-leafed, shimmering off-the-shoulder-perfume for a night of anniversary celebrations of champagne, top restaurants and ‘intimacy’  (that other euphemism; what are Americans afraid of?) is, in its own way, sheer perfection. Though for me this perfume is perhaps too tame, too balanced, too ‘just so’ (one and a half glasses of champagne, never the whole bottle), the skilful blending of this perfume manages to encompass, quite effortessly, and silkily, the essence of the ‘American Woman’ we see wheeled-out yearly at the Oscars and the Golden Globes. Clean yet sexy; not a hair out of place; so well put together; smooth-skinned, toned…..a modern amber perfume that makes all the right noises, folding in on itself and then unfolding lightly; tastefully, blossomingly and eminently, seductive. Amber Musk has the potential to be a big hit because it ticks all the right boxes for a certain kind of woman, who may or may not exist in reality: one who is managing to ‘do it all’; have a lucrative, and fulfilling professional life; raise a family; exercise regularly; take care of her appearance; smell good; love her man; and smile, always, or as much as she can, with those ever-enviable, orthodontically immaculate, sparkling white teeth.

42 Comments

Filed under Flowers

BARBRA STREISAND’S NOSE

 

 

 

Image

 

 

Image

 

 

 

 

Image

 

 

 

 

Image

 

 

 

 

 

Image

 

 

 

 

 

She has one of the most famous noses in the world: a honker, a schnoz; an unmistakeable profile that provokes love/hate reactions from her fans and detractors. But Barbra Streisand was surely in on the big nasal joke when she took on the role of Hillary Kramer in the 1979 comedy romance film ‘The Main Event’.

 

The story of a ‘nose’, director of her own successful perfume house, the film begins with Kramer ecstatically inhaling a new team-effort formula created by her in-house perfumers, a revolutionary unisex number that she is convinced will be a super-hit, the camera honing in woozily on that proud Cleopatran nez as she swoons heartily with approval:

 

 

” Smooth…….high quality….

There is an orgy going on right here in my nose!!”

 

 

 

 

Image

 

 

 

Image

 

 

 

 

Soon though, despite my delight that here at last there was a movie about a perfumer (I had had no idea that the film was going to touch on this theme : this was just a DVD I picked up for next to nothing knowing zilch about it in advance: I had never even heard of it, just fancied some easeful trash for a Saturday night at home), although the groaning pun of the tagline    ” ….a glove story” should have nevertheless told me what the film is actually about :  boxing. Yes, to her great chagrin, and ours, very soon the perfumer is unfortunately forced to abandon the beloved fragrance house she has spent so many years building up due to the fact that her rascal accountant has gone off and absconded with all of her money. Facing financial ruin she is forced to resort to……umm, training up a boxer (????!!!);  get him off his lazy ass, and turn him into a champion in order to make them both some dough and save the day.  Which, Barbra being Barbra with her barking, Nu Yoik chutzpah, she obviously manages to do, while just happening simultaneously to fall in love with her handsome scoundrel boxing protegé to boot.

 

 

It is a pretty awful film, to be honest –  nigh unwatchable ( I got through it, eventually, in two or three sittings – Duncan refusing to join me),  full of zany, unfunny clunkers and entirely unconvincing dialogue; zero chemistry between her and the hunky Ryan O Neal (maybe that’s what made me buy it come to think of it, the thought of our Ryan in his boxing shorts……) Nevertheless, I must admit that it did provide some amusement: the woman is an icon, and I suppose I have always had a bit of a soft spot for her.

 

 

Yes, Barbra Streisand is an icon of the highest order for deviants of the western hemisphere: we all had mothers who blasted out The Way We Were, You Don’t Bring Me Flowers, and Evergreen in the 70’s and 80’s, felt the dark surging drama of A Woman In Love as it stormed to the top of the charts at the start of the decade………….  Duncan, in fact, along with his brother and dad, was compelled by his mother to listen to the Guilty album so many times, hundreds – even thousands he swears – several times on practically a daily basis, that he now has a strange Pavlovian response whenever he happens to hear a song from that Barry Gibb-produced opus; you can see something happening internally; his features twitching in traumatized recognition, the eyes going a bit distant, rich and strange,  for he knows every single bit of instrumentation on that record, every last strum of  wah wah and drum, every last curlicue of backing vocal; all details in such painstaking intensity, the album having permeated the walls of his parents’ home for so many years, that it practically constituted a form of head-mangling, pop-record brainwashing.

 

 

Duncan can’t stand Barbra Streisand, actually, and I can understand why after having undergone such auditory torture (although I must say that I did do  exactly the same thing to my own family with Blondie’s ‘Rapture’ single, which I bought at the age of 9, and which I twirled and gyrated endlessly to upstairs in my room, all day, every day, on full blast until the point when my parents could tolerate no more and literally confiscated the single). But in our household too, Streisand, that  warbling, high-pitched songstress was beloved by my mother too, though to  a lesser degree; she wasn’t liked by my father, and, unsurprisingly was hated by Duncan’s dad as well  (” ……that bloody, beaky woman…”), but in any case, she formed such a towering and undeniable diva-drenched presence though our childhoods, that just seeing that face, that nose (especially when it is inhaling perfume!) gives me a certain, calming, nostalgic pleasure.

 

 

Watching her also recently in 1975’s Funny Lady, which I also picked up at a Tokyo secondhand DVD shop for a dime (perhaps I am drawn to her more than I am letting on? I do find her beautiful)I realize that as an actress, Streisand’s comic timing is spot on; she has the saucy, finger-snapping repartee of Mae West; the full, screen-eating presence that only stars of the highest calibre can muster. In essence, as much as you may want to, you can’t take your eyes off her.

 

 

*    *

 

 

 

I must say that the singer/actress is a quite believable perfumer in The Main Event. Just look at the way she inhales; the concentration; the exaggerated, eye-rolling, facial expressions of indulgent olfactory orgasm we are all prone to. Seeing that same expression on screen, in a film, I must say was a pleasing, and amusing, parody of we crazed perfumistas. You know you have also made that same face in the presence of olfactory greatness,  gone a touch doolally, on more than one occasion.

 

 

 

 

Image

 

 

 

 

Image

 

 

 

 

 

Image

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image

 

 

 

 

In The Main Event, the character that Barbra Streisand plays really knows her stuff; oh she sure does love the excitement of a good perfume. But the woman, now semi-retired, in real life, also clearly has good scent taste. Barbra Streisand’s signature scent is said to be Guerlain’s profound and quizzical masterpiece Vol De Nuit, a green, narcissus, spiced oriental perfume I also adore; a scent that hovers about you like deep, soft intrigue, that keeps you at civilized distance while simultaneously drawing you in like a moth to the flame. The woman’s nose (oh, that nose!) is obviously as good off-screen as it is on, because, you know, perfume, in my opinion, really doesn’t get much better than that.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Image

47 Comments

Filed under Flowers