Monthly Archives: June 2016

CELEBRATING THE 400TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE BIRTH OF WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE: : : : : A MIDSUMMER DREAM……….. by ROJA DOVE (2016)

 

 

 

Sam-waldman-on-theater-photo-Daniel-Rolnik-midsummer-nights-dream

 

 

 

 

 

 

” I know a bank where the wild thyme blows,

Where oxlips and the nodding violet grows,

Quite over-canopied with luscious woodbine,

With sweet musk-roses and with eglantine…”

 

 

 

 

 

I would have liked to have sprinkled this review of the new release by Roja Dove, ‘A Midsummer Dream’ ,with spritely allusions to the plays of William Shakespeare, all flowers and woodland groves, cleverly enmeshed, wrapped up with perfumed inspirations and evocations of a beautiful, English fairy tale. A veritable literary scent critique, if you will. But something, I must say, doth prevent me. Firstly, I am no way near as familiar with the plays of the Great Bard as I would like to be. And secondly, this perfume is, I am afraid to say, almost wholly uninspiring.

 

 

 

I know! How disappointing to begin such a promising piece in such a negative fashion. Well, blame Roja Dove. It would be have been lovely if this perfume had been some gossamer, romance-laden, Anglophilic, June bride masterpiece. A scent, indeed, to make one dream (as the finest perfumes often do), with that ever elusive aspect of the eternal and the indefinable.  The promise was certainly there. When I saw the name on the white box, my olfactory curiosity was very much piqued . Would it be a powdered, Elizabethan rose, dusted with English lavender, sweet leaves o’ marjoram, and secret, undernote alchemies? Would it be Puck-like, mischievous and magical, a feast of the undergrowth, all green leaves, garlands, and bucolic whimsy?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oberon, Titania and Puck with Fairies Dancing circa 1786 by William Blake 1757-1827

 

 

 

 

 

42499899-19th-century-engraving-of-the-Church-of-the-Holy-Trinity-Stratford-upon-Avon-UK-Stock-Photo.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

I grew up in a town called Solihull, about half an hour or so from Stratford-Upon-Avon, Shakespeare’s place of birth, a charming little place with thatched cottages and rose-filled English gardens, where thousands of visitors go every year to walk through the Birth House or watch plays by the Royal Shakespeare Company, to traipse through the town in search of all things William; and I have great memories of lounging by the reedy river getting drunk in high summertime with my high school friends, sitting contentedly on the terrace at the Dirty Duck pub just across from the Swan Theatre, or looking wistfully at the tree by the water that was planted there by Laurence Olivier for the beautiful, and by that point probably  mad, Vivien Leigh.

 

 

 

 

 

vivien-leigh-midsummer.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

The last time I went to Stratford was quite a while ago. It was just my mother and myself, off on a spontaneously decided day trip. We had a nice day, seeing the sights, having lunch at a riverside cafe, just relaxing in the light and talking. Typically for me, though, I was much less interested in the historical facts and realities of Shakespeare’s life ( I was never one for those ‘interactive installations: relive how life was in Shakespeare’s time!! types), as they, to me, while useful for school kids’ education, are just too ugly.  I remember, though, on that day, we went to the beautiful Trinity church where the poet was buried and walked through several of the famous houses connected to his life that still exist in the town; all perfectly and lovingly preserved by English heritage groups, as quaint and Shakespearian as you would hope they would be – though as I say I  was far more absorbed by the atmosphere of the gardens and the feelings of the rooms than the historical facts and figures provided. In particular, there was an artfully arranged vase of black and dark red dahlias that utterly captured my imagination, placed against the wall in the black and white timbered room, bathed, against the thick panes of glass, in the motes of the afternoon  summer light; flowers that were like a silent, still, portal into another time and place. At that particular moment, away from the crowds and the noise with the sound of birds coming in from the trees in the garden, for just a few moments, I felt it.

 

 

 

 

 

fairyroom_midsummer-playbill

 

 

 

 

 

 

At school we read a few Shakespeare plays, I remember, and I quite enjoyed them. A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Macbeth, and Much Ado About Nothing, among others, and in high school, where I focused on just three subjects –  English Literature, French, and German language, we read a couple of his plays in very great and exhaustive detail:  Richard II (a bit boring: I couldn’t care less about armies, avarice, and the politics of the past), but also, far more fascinatingly for me, The Tempest, whose windswept and watery world I delved into with great relish. The language, the imagery, the strange ethereal beauty, this was probably the closest I ever got to really ‘getting’ Shakespeare, and that play is now part of my cultural bloodstream.

 

 

 

Aside a couple of nights at the theatre, though, I have never got as inside the great man’s brain as I would like to (please, if you are reading this, tell me your own greatest Shakespeare experiences), and just writing this is making me really want to start reading him again and find out what I have been missing.  I once did see Othello at a theatre here in Tokyo, a few years ago, Japanese literary snobs and English professors ‘laughing’ along to the in-jokes and little, in built witticisms to show their literary prowess and deep understanding of the language), but despite my minor irritations  – I never could abide brittle academia – I have to say that that performance of Othello was a heavy and intense night of passion and murder and intrigue. Everyone there certainly got swept up in its furious brilliance.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

midsummerperfumedevent1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But, to perfume.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

nd.38901

 

 

 

 

 

How do you capture the genius of Shakespeare in a perfume?

 

 

 

 

I don’t know, but I do know that, unfortunately, A Midsummer Dream is certainly not it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

” There is a willow grows aslant a brook, That shows his hoar leaves in the glassy stream; There with fantastic garlands did she come Of crow-flowers, nettles, daisies, and long purples That liberal shepherds give a grosser name, But our cold maids do dead men’s fingers call them: There, on the pendent boughs her coronet weeds Clambering to hang, an envious sliver broke; When down her weedy trophies and herself Fell in the weeping brook.” 

 

 

 

 

This is ideally how I would have liked this perfume to smell (which just shows you how much I dwell in reality).  Upon the first spray of the scent, rather than magic I smell instead something completely familiar and quotidian (and very twenty first century); not dull, exactly, but certainly not without platitudes. Something almost Paloma Picasso Minotaure-like (this definitely veers more to the traditionally masculine than the feminine), a fresh (but very confused) bouquet of grapefruit, elemi, cardamom, bergamot and pink pepper (why?), over more powdery – as we might expect – ‘moss’, orange blossoms, vetiver, cedar, and benzoin, with some wisps of orris butter and carrot seeds. If the list of ingredients makes the perfume difficult to imagine exactly, it is also hard to distinguish what it is trying to say to you when it is on the skin. It doesn’t fuse properly or have any discernible theme. I just get a vaguely sports-like fragrance with strong intimations of cheap washing detergent; nothing poetic, or English, or stimulating to my own febrile imagination, which I have to say is very disappointing.

 

 

 

 

Roja Dove perfumes are usually very thick with eiderdowny perfume love :  all unguents and flower oils and pressed together top-to-bottom strata. They might not have the angularity and immediacy of more consummate creations by Guerlain and their like but they are often intimatingly secretive with compacted, concealing emotions and unreleased sexual tensions. I expect complexity and slow concealments in fragrances from this house, and a concept of a perfume that is based on a play of intrigue and gradual revelations would also surely have been the perfect opportunity to demonstrate further this sensual prowess.

 

 

 

Instead, though I might just be a fool, mad as Puck, misreading the perfume and not understanding its intentionally lighthearted, spritz love-poem theme, and could also  probably do with possibly smelling it properly on another person (because “there is nothing either good or bad but thinking makes it so” – to quote from the play), at the price they are asking for this perfume, if I am absolutely honest, I think you would really have to have your head in the clouds, or the head of an ass

 

 

 

Unknown-3

 

 

 

 

to fork out the money for this wan, unrealized little trifle.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“Lord, what fools these mortals be!”

 

 

 

(William Shakespeare, A Midsummer Night’s Dream)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11 Comments

Filed under Flowers

LUXURY, LUXURY, LUXURY: : THREE BRIGHT NEW TOM FORD RELEASES FOR SUMMER: : : : NEROLI PORTOFINO FORTE (2016) + SOLEIL BLANC (2016) + ORCHID SOLEIL (2016)

 

 

o.42525

 

 

I think I have perhaps been unfairly snidey about Tom Ford. Perhaps from my own personal irritations and issues with the (justly maligned), “1%”, I have been either overly dismissive, or else a bit sarcastic, on anything to do with the master of suave and  tuxedoed ‘refinement’  – and there I go again.

 

I suppose it is all to do with ‘luxury. On the one hand, I write about perfume, which by definition would be considered by most people to be something luxurious and superfluous, even though you and I know that it is in fact something quite essential. Still, were a person to truly live the Tom Ford Life, the Gucci Life, the Saint Laurent Life –  that rarified, super-rich, tax-free, more moneyed-than-you-will-ever-even-dream-of-life, with all the condos and the security guarded holiday duplexes, the private pools, the Panamanian tax haven off shore accounts; the clothes, the jewellery, the makeup, and the extravagantly expensive perfumes, it would surely be like being hermetically sealed off from all known-to-human reality. These contradictions with my own life philosophies, and ways of thinking and living, as a perfume writer, sometimes do really actually trouble me.

 

No. Yesterday I was in the wrong mood for Ginza. For the pretentious, and snobbish, Tokyo high life. I just really didn’t at all feel like it at all once I got there. The rainy season is setting in, so it is grey and humid, we have both been unwell with colds and I can also hardly walk normally with my knee issues either, so it was perhaps inappropriate and ill advised of me to travel up to Tokyo, on my day off, to ‘saunter’ about the richest neighbourhood – no you cant even call it that it is practically a jewelled citadel, in this city, peruse the latest fumes at Hankyu Department store and the brand new, glitteringly swanky Tokyu Plaza. No. Yesterday it just all felt like too much. I felt alienated. There are some days in my life when not only the branded, hyperexpensive goods on display, but also all the things to buy buy buy, in any shop, in any kiosk, even, from the food in the convenience stores to toiletries in pharmacy windows down to even the most meaningless trinket just threaten to overwhelm my brain and senses and I just feel like hiding away in some mountainous, silent, Buddhist, retreat. I hated Tokyo yesterday. It felt artificial, crudely capitalistic, and verging on inhuman.

 

 

 

 

 

tom-forsd-np-forte

 

 

 

 

Yet despite all this, and my own peculiar inner turmoil, the moment I smelled Neroli Portofino Forte, the latest flanker in the very successful Neroli Portofino series, I was transported.  It was like actually being part of that luxury: theoretically sealed from damage: from harm: from life. A strange hush came over my brain as the impossibly handsome Japanese man sprayed this new summer perfume on a card, as though I were being undressed in a beautiful white hotel room after a long, but uber-smooth journey between destinations, and this was the only scent that would guide me through to my next, hassle-free, chapter. On the terrace, by the pool, a refreshing and captivating cocktail just looking at the sunset, as the fears of the real world fade away and you look into your beautiful partner’s eyes with a deep look of smug satisfaction, sorry I mean love; and appreciation.

 

 

 

It is perfect. Somehow rich and dense with orange blossom, neroli, bergamot and blood orange, but also fresh, clear, and nipped with tartness with the addition of galbanum, plus a soupçon of basil and lavender for the required tautness, this feels natural, exhilarating, yet tranquillizing all at the same time. Naturally there are some ‘woodsy’ and musk notes somewhere in the base notes for anchoring and endurance, to make the perfume last longer through the day, and admittedly I didn’t try this perfume on my skin, but my instinctive reaction was that here was perhaps the ultimate neroli. At four hundred dollars, it is certainly much more expensive than buying some old bottle of 4711 or the like, but I would say that probably, if you want a immediate, and sense-ecstacizing orange blossom scent,  it is worth it. Neroli Portofino Forte put me, for a solitary moment, into a state of serene, luxurized, calm.

 

 

 

 

 

u_888066048873_01

 

 

 

 

As, it has to be said, did the calmly hypnotic new entry into the Tom Ford Private Collection stable, Soleil Blanc. With notes of ylang ylang, tuberose, Egyptian jasmine, benzoin, bitter almond,  tonka bean and coconut milk, along with some cardamom and the ubiquitous pink pepper in the head accord (the only note of all these that I am not especially bothered about), the perfume would have to go very wrong indeed for me not to like it, and indeed I did. A lot. Immediately recognizable as pure summer, and beach, and suntan cream and that warm, carefree, dreamy feeling, the composition is far more muted (for me, in a good way) than you might expect (again: surely, an unshakeable sense of self, and one’s own refinement and ‘good taste’ is one desirable symptom of luxe).

 

 

 

 

 

And Soleil Blanc is definitely not a perfume that screams or plies its considerable charms to get attention. Rather, it sinks into the skin like a bed of cotton sheets on a hot, summer afternoon, smooth as a pebble and seamless as a wave. What’s clever about the execution of this perfume is the way that it immaculately does actually capture the name that it has been given: undoubtedly a ‘solar’ perfume in its cream of fleurs blancs and softely undulating coconut milk, it is also, simultaneously, very white, with a shimmer of white light and the lazing, sleepful hush of a private cove. While a synthetic element at the heart of the perfume did jar on my senses for a short duration of the perfume’s skin life (probably, in fact that very ‘white’ component which put me in mind, a little, of Creed’s own Love In White, and Armani White She), as the perfume dries down, it is so tender and calming, the smell of tiare flowers and monoï fused with sunmilk and sun-kissed skin, that I couldn’t help feeling that I perhaps actually really wanted it (not that I can afford it, mind you). No: on me, it would probably smell quite nice, in its own, immutable, way, but what it really needs in fact is something like a stunning, Barbadian Bond girl, sashaying past in some exclusive hotel bar resort complex in white dress and accessories, fresh from the poolside, clad dreamily in this scent: a smooth-skinned, unperturbable vision of  sexual luminosity.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Serenity flows from white orchids

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hypocritically, I wandered around the streets of Ginza a little more, happy, now, in my usual nose-driven way, smelling these two perfumes along with some other new discoveries that I had made; then got a series of very crowded, stressful, trains at the rush hour back down to where we live in Kamakura, where, as luck would have it, a package had just arrived from my professional perfume writer friend in England – Bethan, containing, quite coincidentally, among other new exclusives, the (as yet unreleased) new perfume from Tom Ford in his mainstream (read pleb) collection – Orchid Soleil.

 

 

 

 

 

 

o-1.42525

 

 

 

 

 

Now I have been very unkind about both Black Orchid and Velvet Orchid in the past. I don’t know. Perhaps I just don’t understand them. Maybe I am totally wrong. And I am perfectly open to suggestion and never close-minded enough not to appreciate a perfume that I have formerly not ‘got’, or one which simply just smelled wrong on me:  in fact I love it when I am wrong about a scent and someone is wearing that very same smell and it is fantastic on them for whatever skin chemistry related reasons as it shows you just how complex and intricate this invisible, unsung art form really is. I am certain (well, kind of) that on some people these thick, slick and glitzy perfumes smell ‘glam’ and ‘luxurious’ and ‘sexy’, or whatever (ooh, listen to the snob in him coming out here despite his aforementioned class warfare objections.) But I personally, so far, in this ‘Black Orchid’ series, have just found the perfumes to be nasty, illegible, and worse, utterly indigestible. And at around four times cheaper than the perfumes I have just been discussing above, they really smell it. Gone is the clarity and the high riding, velour lubricity, and in its place is a cauldron of lewd chemicals to be orchestrated and stirred greedily into an olfactory monster ( I exaggerate, yes of course I realize that, but this is how I personally experience these perfumes – I withdraw immediately, instinctively from them, a nasal recoiling that comes from a sense of sheer malcomprehension and dismay at my inability to understand why they are so popular, or win Fragrance awards, or ‘Beauty Editor’ top picks or whatever: I wonder, in essence (though not really): what the hell is wrong with me?)

 

 

 

In any case, then,  Orchid Soleil, surely, is an opportunity for me to rectify my defiency. It already has ‘soleil’ in the name, which bodes well for me, because I adore summer, the sea, and the beach (as if you didn’t know that already). And I like the smell of orchids in perfumes as well – I remember L’Artisan Parfumeur’s lovely Orchidée Blanche from many moons ago: powdery, sweet and vanillic, romantic and so very very plush, as well as the rave review I gave recently of Oriza Le Grand’s delirious Jardins D’Amide, so as an orchid-liker, I am ready, now,  with a relatively open mind, to be dissuaded from my Velvet Orchid (pass the sick bowl) prejudices.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

phalaenopsis_white2

 

 

 

 

 

 

But no. 

 

 

 

I am sorry.

 

 

 

 

With notes of ‘red spider lily’, ‘chestnut cream’, orchid, vanilla, cypress, pink pepper, tuberose and bitter orange, the perfume is not the sun-lit beach flower I was hoping that it might be, but rather a glossy, deep-throated throwback to the powerhouse florientals of the late eighties and nineties, a gross amalgam of Lancôme’s unfortunate Poȇme, and the powdery, cone-bra’d Jean Paul Gaultier (which I quite like): all orange blossomy (but so different to the exquisite Neroli Portofino Forte!) and dense and pushed up décolletage, along with those familiar and always unwelcome ‘chocolatey’ notes (and it is these I can never get along with in such a blend : I need Alka Seltzers just sniffing this perfume from the bottle: I am certainly not going to go for another spray, I can tell you), along with some extraneous metallics and sweet, thigh-enhancing gourmands. While nowhere near as awful as Marc Jacob’s unforgivable Decadence, I have to confess that I find this kind of perfume slightly nauseating. While part of me (the vulgar side, the Dynasty and Dallas loving side, the party animal side, the sexy lady side) approves of a move back to the big personality perfumes of the past, when perfume was exciting and heady and gorgeous and unforgettable (and in the base notes of this scent, some form of congruity finally appears and it does,  I will admit, have some kind of booze-soaked, erotic, beach club appeal, and is also, undeniably, an improvement on the other two ‘Orchids’ ( that entire genus of flora should actually sue Tom Ford for defamation)); but at the same time, I am afraid to say, the release of this latest Black Orchid flanker just confirms my suspicions.

 

 

 

 

At the beginning of this piece I chastised myself for not giving Mr Ford a fair deal: in always, despite the very fine selection of perfumes available in his stable, being a touch too sneering and cynical, in always focusing on the moneyed aspect of his perfumery rather than the compositions themselves. But how can I help it? Today’s perfumes prove my point about this label (and about much of the way that the world itself is going in these unfair times), precisely. In presenting us with these perfumes –  lovely creations such as Neroli Portofino Forte and Soleil Blanc, as well as others than I love from the extortionately expensive Private Collection range such as Mandarino d’Amalfi, Jasmin Rouge, Champaca Absolute, Ombre De Hyacinthe and several others, the master of sleek chic and red velvet social distinctions is, in my view, expressly, not just in the price of the perfumes but in the smell of them as well, deliberately making a clear social divide between those people that smell effortlessly beautiful, fresh and stylish,as they glide past you in their haute couture creations and their private limousines, and those that smell – the poor things, so excited to be clutching a bottle of ‘Tom Ford’and imagining they are a part of the ‘high life’-like a garish, eager, over-dressed-up dog’s dinner.

24 Comments

Filed under Flowers

VERO PROFUMO :ROZY EXTRAIT (2014)

 

 

“I HATE RESPECTABILITY. GIVE ME THE LIFE OF THE STREETS, THE COMMON PEOPLE”.

 

 

(Anna Magnani)

 

 

thumbnail_Screen Shot 2016-06-04 at 13.17.19.jpg.png

 

 

 

thumbnail_Screen Shot 2016-06-04 at 13.15.24.jpg.png

 

 

 

(by Olivia)

 

 

 

 

A couple of years ago, I attended the launch of Vero Kern’s latest perfume at Bloom Perfumery in London.  In this small, intimate place just off London’s Spitalfields market we were introduced to Rozy, a tribute to the dynamic Italian actress Anna Magnani. Magnani was, by all accounts a force of nature, ‘La Lupa’ – a fiery, dynamic she-wolf with a ‘loud, overwhelming and tragic laugh.’ Winning an Oscar for her part in the 1955 film ‘The Rose Tattoo’, an adaptation of the Tennessee Williams play, Magnani was – at a time when in many parts of the world, idealised femininity was iced in pastel pink and wrapped in Tupperware – possessed of a total lack of timidity. Self assured, confrontational and unconventional, her domineering presence was Etna-like in its fiery expulsion.

My abiding memory of that evening is being handed a smelling strip dipped in the base accord. An intense honeyed labdanum, opaque and lacquer-like, it oozed off the strip in unguent, spoonable reams. Heady and thick, it was utterly irresistible to the little bee in me (I am a complete devotee of honey in perfumes.) At the time, only the Eau de Parfum and the Voile d’Extrait – an effervescent interpretation of the Extrait, were in production. As with all Vero Kern’s perfumes, each fragrance is translated into different concentrations: the same idea, played in out not only in terms of the differing strengths traditionally associated with EDT, EDP and Extrait, but reinterpreted so that in each the notes play greater or lesser roles; understudies shine in lights where elsewhere they bolster main accords, who in turn swell to crescendo starlit by only glints of notes elsewhere writ large. Seen as a triptych body of work, they are like the different refractions of light in a jewel: the glinting coloured variations of one stone (or idea, in this case.) I though, wanted more of this base accord. I wanted to be entombed in honey and beeswax. I wanted the Extrait.

Rozy, the extrait, is not necessarily an easy perfume. Like its muse, it is tempestuous, bolshy and fiery. Applying it unleashes a whip crack of spiced tuberose and currant buds, camphorous and bistre notes that swell and skid across the skin like gathering storm clouds. There is a tang of kerosene in the air, shadows race, the air thickens. A sense of foreboding looms. The tuberose here isn’t a creamy wash of tropicality, but to me it’s the same earthen, boot-brown hue as it is in Lutens’ Tubereuse Criminelle: its petals have been similarly bruised and crumpled to the colour of tea stains. Only here it’s missing that searing wintergreen slap and is folded into the blend, only to be glimpsed every now and then as the dervish twister licks around you. As many other people have written, despite the name this perfume is not really rosy. The rose is there, bloody and puce, but it lends a more a sense of fleshy velvet more than its likeness. There are thick petals, pregnant with pollen and laced with that slick of motor oil into a dense, arabesque weave – there is a great sense of texture, of minute detail amid the operatic whole. There is a sense actually, of fine detail blown up, zoomed into and viewed on the big screen: a drama played in microscopic close up. Even if it isn’t always easily warmed to – I personally couldn’t throw this opus on unthinkingly every morning – the attention to detail and the delicate balancing of such boisterous notes is beautiful.  It seeps, opaque and attar like, and is woven into the flesh like tattooists inks being laced with the skin.

Finally, slowly, redemption is offered from the dusky bruise raging up top. Like caramel thickening in a pan, bubbles of light begin to rise from the fire pit – a thick slew of waxy, nutmeg flecked honey forms and bleeds across the skin.  Luminous bands of gold stream through the air in lustrous, liquid effulgence. This is Etna’s lava bleeding like molten sunshine through the ashy brimstone, spitting solar spears. This isn’t one of those cop-out cosy bases though – the animalic qualities of honey are all on show here, gussied up by that smoky, balsamic labdanum. This is the smell of skin, of people, pungent and sticky – bodies thriving in the heat of life, sweet and dirty and real.

It is changeable though, and spins on a sixpence. I don’t always get the sweet honeyed sap so soon with this perfume. The other day when I wore it, over time I was pricked by a disconcerting sensation – something almost imperceptible, a sooty tint toward the edges of my day. Something prickling, slightly familiar but also out of reach and not strictly of me – instead, a sensation of something misty gathered along the way or embossed silently onto me (indeed, tattoo-like.) The feeling, I realised, was something akin that of having been up all night: the lingering scented shadow that a night out leaves on your clothes, your hair, at your fingertips. A ghostly, grubby lick of cigarette smoke and the sweet traces of booze, of the chill of night in your hair and of pewter spun moonlit air. An ashy shawl, laced with the densely sweet animal warmth of a body that has been moving for hours past bedtime. A memory of heavy lidded eyes and woozy limbs as you strike for home in a milky dawn: the scent of that swarthy, nocturnal world, and the creatures of the night as they melt again in Aurora’s rosy radiance.

I suppose it is in essence a floriental – it certainly has the heft and lusty presence of some of those big 80’s perfumes, and is exuberant and flamboyant in the same way. There is perhaps, something of Poison about it in its burlesque prima donna drama and slash of indecency. But Rozy is far more leathery, heated and enraged: there is Latin temperament scoured through its heart. At times wearing it has also brought to mind the raunchy honey of Shocking de Schiaparelli and, to a lesser extent, Miel de Bois. These are bawdy, risqué scents that flaunt taboos and court bad taste with glee. Mischievous and wanton perfumes that on the right skin work a smutty magic that straddles the salty/sweet borders of decency. But while Rozy borrows the allure of this ambrosial tang, it is less floral than Shocking (and more modern), and more leathery than the Lutens. It is absolutely its own thing, as a perfume that is a totem of independence and rebellion should be.

Rozy is lupine and snarling, defiant and warring. But that nectarous base behind the claws, with its piquantly silken sweetness is reassurance that behind the protective growl is the nurturing maternal lick of a cub’s cheek. Rozy, in extrait, can be difficult – there is I think though, a place in all collections for perfumes such as this: a disturbing, occasionally even uncomfortable but meticulously crafted and brilliant perfume. For all its scattered, mannish accents (the leather, the kerosene), this is a resolutely womanly scent that wears like Amazonian armour: a ‘fiery eyed maid of smoky war’ (Henry IV, Pt. 1), a thrumming Bellona of a perfume.

A couple of years ago, I attended the launch of Vero Kern’s latest perfume at Bloom Perfumery in London.  In this small, intimate place just off London’s Spitalfields market we were introduced to Rozy, a tribute to the dynamic Italian actress Anna Magnani. Magnani was, by all accounts a force of nature, ‘La Lupa’ – a fiery, dynamic she-wolf with a ‘loud, overwhelming and tragic laugh.’ Winning an Oscar for her part in the 1955 film ‘The Rose Tattoo’, an adaptation of the Tennessee Williams play, Magnani was – at a time when in many parts of the world, idealised femininity was iced in pastel pink and wrapped in Tupperware – possessed of a total lack of timidity. Self assured, confrontational and unconventional, her domineering presence was Etna-like in its fiery expulsion.

My abiding memory of that evening is being handed a smelling strip dipped in the base accord. An intense honeyed labdanum, opaque and lacquer-like, it oozed off the strip in unguent, spoonable reams. Heady and thick, it was utterly irresistible to the little bee in me (I am a complete devotee of honey in perfumes.) At the time, only the Eau de Parfum and the Voile d’Extrait – an effervescent interpretation of the Extrait, were in production. As with all Vero Kern’s perfumes, each fragrance is translated into different concentrations: the same idea, played in out not only in terms of the differing strengths traditionally associated with EDT, EDP and Extrait, but reinterpreted so that in each the notes play greater or lesser roles; understudies shine in lights where elsewhere they bolster main accords, who in turn swell to crescendo starlit by only glints of notes elsewhere writ large. Seen as a triptych body of work, they are like the different refractions of light in a jewel: the glinting coloured variations of one stone (or idea, in this case.) I though, wanted more of this base accord. I wanted to be entombed in honey and beeswax. I wanted the Extrait.

Rozy, the extrait, is not necessarily an easy perfume. Like its muse, it is tempestuous, bolshy and fiery. Applying it unleashes a whip crack of spiced tuberose and currant buds, camphorous and bistre notes that swell and skid across the skin like gathering storm clouds. There is a tang of kerosene in the air, shadows race, the air thickens. A sense of foreboding looms. The tuberose here isn’t a creamy wash of tropicality, but to me it’s the same earthen, boot-brown hue as it is in Lutens’ Tubereuse Criminelle: its petals have been similarly bruised and crumpled to the colour of tea stains. Only here it’s missing that searing wintergreen slap and is folded into the blend, only to be glimpsed every now and then as the dervish twister licks around you. As many other people have written, despite the name this perfume is not really rosy. The rose is there, bloody and puce, but it lends a more a sense of fleshy velvet more than its likeness. There are thick petals, pregnant with pollen and laced with that slick of motor oil into a dense, arabesque weave – there is a great sense of texture, of minute detail amid the operatic whole. There is a sense actually, of fine detail blown up, zoomed into and viewed on the big screen: a drama played in microscopic close up. Even if it isn’t always easily warmed to – I personally couldn’t throw this opus on unthinkingly every morning – the attention to detail and the delicate balancing of such boisterous notes is beautiful.  It seeps, opaque and attar like, and is woven into the flesh like tattooists inks being laced with the skin.

Finally, slowly, redemption is offered from the dusky bruise raging up top. Like caramel thickening in a pan, bubbles of light begin to rise from the fire pit – a thick slew of waxy, nutmeg flecked honey forms and bleeds across the skin.  Luminous bands of gold stream through the air in lustrous, liquid effulgence. This is Etna’s lava bleeding like molten sunshine through the ashy brimstone, spitting solar spears. This isn’t one of those cop-out cosy bases though – the animalic qualities of honey are all on show here, gussied up by that smoky, balsamic labdanum. This is the smell of skin, of people, pungent and sticky – bodies thriving in the heat of life, sweet and dirty and real.

It is changeable though, and spins on a sixpence. I don’t always get the sweet honeyed sap so soon with this perfume. The other day when I wore it, over time I was pricked by a disconcerting sensation – something almost imperceptible, a sooty tint toward the edges of my day. Something prickling, slightly familiar but also out of reach and not strictly of me – instead, a sensation of something misty gathered along the way or embossed silently onto me (indeed, tattoo-like.) The feeling, I realised, was something akin that of having been up all night: the lingering scented shadow that a night out leaves on your clothes, your hair, at your fingertips. A ghostly, grubby lick of cigarette smoke and the sweet traces of booze, of the chill of night in your hair and of pewter spun moonlit air. An ashy shawl, laced with the densely sweet animal warmth of a body that has been moving for hours past bedtime. A memory of heavy lidded eyes and woozy limbs as you strike for home in a milky dawn: the scent of that swarthy, nocturnal world, and the creatures of the night as they melt again in Aurora’s rosy radiance.

I suppose it is in essence a floriental – it certainly has the heft and lusty presence of some of those big 80’s perfumes, and is exuberant and flamboyant in the same way. There is perhaps, something of Poison about it in its burlesque prima donna drama and slash of indecency. But Rozy is far more leathery, heated and enraged: there is Latin temperament scoured through its heart. At times wearing it has also brought to mind the raunchy honey of Shocking de Schiaparelli and, to a lesser extent, Miel de Bois. These are bawdy, risqué scents that flaunt taboos and court bad taste with glee. Mischievous and wanton perfumes that on the right skin work a smutty magic that straddles the salty/sweet borders of decency. But while Rozy borrows the allure of this ambrosial tang, it is less floral than Shocking (and more modern), and more leathery than the Lutens. It is absolutely its own thing, as a perfume that is a totem of independence and rebellion should be.

Rozy is lupine and snarling, defiant and warring. But that nectarous base behind the claws, with its piquantly silken sweetness is reassurance that behind the protective growl is the nurturing maternal lick of a cub’s cheek. Rozy, in extrait, can be difficult – there is I think though, a place in all collections for perfumes such as this: a disturbing, occasionally even uncomfortable but meticulously crafted and brilliant perfume. For all its scattered, mannish accents (the leather, the kerosene), this is a resolutely womanly scent that wears like Amazonian armour: a ‘fiery eyed maid of smoky war’ (Henry IV, Pt. 1), a thrumming Bellona of a perfume.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9 Comments

Filed under Flowers

a flash of fruit and the night was mine………….BLACK ANGEL, DEVIL IN DISGUISE and SLEEPING WITH GHOSTS by MARK BUXTON (2012)

And then the perfumes he made….

 

Source:

 

a flash of fruit and the night was mine………….BLACK ANGEL, DEVIL IN DISGUISE and SLEEPING WITH GHOSTS by MARK BUXTON (2012)

Leave a comment

Filed under Flowers

WHEN I INTERVIEWED THE MAN WHO CREATED COMME DES GARCONS EAU DE PARFUM

 

 

 

 

2010-11-4-154546

 

http://www.aesop.com/usa/article/mark-buxton.html

3 Comments

Filed under Flowers, Spice