The craving for roses goes unabated. A perennial trend, particularly in Tokyo, where the rose is a dependable fallback, Women love roses here, the word either the same — ‘rose’ – enunciated in an inimitable, peculiarly sensual way – or else as the Japanese original, ‘bara’.
Couple that love with the froufrou Parisiana of Diptyque’s signature designs that light up the corner of any department store – I was prowling the newest skyscraper destination in Shibuya yesterday, among thousands of other shoppers on the national holiday before seeing Ari Aster’s wild-flower strewn Midsommar: – and both the beautifully packaged candle – Paris En Fleurs – as well as the new eau de parfum, Eau Capitale, are surely destined to become big hits here.
The Diptycians have not taken any risks with this rose release : the scent immediately familiar in its full richness of rose and patchouli, the classic, chypric, olfactive pairing that put me in mind swiftly of L’Artisan Parfumeur’s Voleur De Roses, Sisley’s Soir De Lune, and Frederic Malle’s Portrait Of A Lady. It is assuredly done, with the usual pink pepper; quite enveloping – if not entirely tingling to my own senses – but with its ‘unisex’ labelling and fullfledgedness, I also do look forward to smelling theses roses on boys – as well as girls – as they make their way about the city this spring (the barazoku, or rose tribe, the code word in Japanese underground slang for the young homosexual man).
Real roses, fresh dawn roses, are emotionally imploring : cut to the quick. I have always found them innocent, protective : a whole world unto themselves : “Love is a rose, but you’d better not pick it “ sang Linda Rondstadt: “…… it only grows on the vine”. Rose Trocadero, by Le Jardin Retrouvé, is one of those courageously uninhibited soliflores that tries to capture that moment of leaning into an erect stem of tea roses in the early morning dew of May or June; Simple, nostalgic, with its touches of black currant bud over a bed of gentle white musk, perfumer Yuri Gusatzt has successfully shied away from overdecoration.
Not so Tom Ford :
– – – where the luxurious provocateur continues his amusing recent pattern of chic, ‘naughtily’ titled perfumes such as Lost Cherry.
As a child, I was always captivated by roses in fairy tales: the stolen white rose leading to Belle’s father’s incarceration by the Beast; the prick of blood on a young maiden’s finger leading to incantations cast by hidden sorceresses ( or later, vampires : Mina, her back arched in ecstasy in the moonlight rose bush gardens of Bram Stoker’s Dracula ) ……… the power of the thorn / flower dichotomy irresistible.
Rather than Snow White, or the Nightingale and the Rose, the screen advertisement for Tom Ford’s latest outré product push features music more suited to a horror movie, as knife edges slash through petals, and roses spill their seed, oozing like light, thick pink matte paint (the colour – which I adore – perfectly fitted to the thick, sweet, clinging tonka beaned, coumarinic turmeric base of the gourmand amber/patchouli heart, peppered with Sichuan I admit I find a little airless and suffocating). Once again, Mr Ford has ripped flowers from their natural habitat, twisting them gamely for his own urbanic predilections. The problem is, that despite the sprightly sexual innuendo of the name, and the promise of ‘juiciness’; —— ‘the prick of a rose, the slight pain that yields such sensual pleasure’ ——— the alleged thick profusion of Bulgarian, Turkish and May roses in the blend to me lacks generosity, fullness:; fecundity. A prick for me has always sounded long, bony ; thin. I much prefer a dick, or a cock.
Me too.
I don’t think either of those words would have worked quite as well: Rose Prick is quite a clever name, I think.
The issue is :: WHERE ARE THE ROSES ?!
Perfumes are getting so STINGY
Although Tom Ford is hardly that when it comes to price tags. Generous to a fault.
He’s one guy that really makes me yawn. Fucking Outrageous made me yawn twice.
I’m glad you reviewed these.
I would have been almost disappointed if you liked Rose Prick.
I WANTED to, and I love the colour of the bottle, and I don’t hate it (and I would like to smell it, perhaps, on another person’s skin).
At the end of the day though, it’s all just about spin. The first two I reviewed here are quite nice – I found Rose Trocadero very charming; open and unpretentious.
Unfortunately Eau Capitale was rather screechy on me. I love Voleur de Roses and prefer it. Portrait of a Lady gives me a pounding headache, no doubt due to the stonking woody amber base. Haven’t tried Rose Prick (totally bored with his outré names and ridiculous pricing), nor Rose Trocadero. My preference leans to richer, more opulent or jammy roses. The only fresh rose scent I ever loved was Annick Goutal Rose Absolue.
Trocadero is more in that vein ( and I also prefer Voleur De Roses – it’s more stealthy).
I’ve just posted my own review of Diptyque Eau Capitale, so catching up on all the online reviews now, Neil. What a pleasure to read your thoughts on these three very different rose fragrances!
I’m enjoying the dirtiness of Eau Capitale, and the simplicity of Trocadero is admirable indeed. I haven’t tried TF Rose Prick,but will have to soon, as it seems to be one of those fragrances you have to have an opinion on.
There are some other big-name roses about: Lancome Idole, Miss Dior Rose N Roses and Maison Francis Kurkdjian L’Eau a la Rose.
Perhaps we’re going to be seeing a lot of roses this year?
( Yawn ) yes I think so ! I would welcome a more novel trend personally !