WHO’S THE MAN? TOM FORD GREY VETIVER
Perfection can be problematic. Like fashion models – often technically physically flawless but curiously lacking in sex appeal – or like Tom Ford’s meticulously worthy cinematic debut ‘A Single Man’, which reached an impeccable consummation in its distinguished acting and artful cinematography (but which personally left me cold), or even the man himself – a suave, handsome hunk who doesn’t seem to grey or age a whisker as the years go by (yet looks strangely plastic), there is a certain muted terror lurking in the seamless infallibility of the TF universe; the ruthless ambition; the nail-clenched, acrylic, lip-drenching gloss.
Grey Vetiver, the first time I smelled it, from the bottle, in an airport, had me nodding again in immediate recognition of another job well done. It was perfect – pitch perfect. A beautifully rendered, citric, peppery, woody vetiver; elegant, masculine, commercial – a bit too solemn and resolute for me perhaps – but undeniably, like all the man’s work, masterfully constructed. And that was that. I didn’t think about the scent again after; for me, one sniff was enough: just one of the many tasteful and discriminating vetivers on the market such as Sycomore, Sel de Vetiver and Vetiver Extraordinaire that, while pleasing, don’t entirely appeal to my emotions, my deeper, more instinctive olfactory synapses.
I do really love vetiver, though. There is a sensuality, an earthiness, but also a mystery and spirituality within the essence’s olfactory DNA, something innately dignified – yet also truthful and open – that always really draws me in. So when I recently spotted a discounted bottle of Tom Ford Grey Vetiver (along with a vintage parfum of Patou 1000) at a recycle shop in Yokohama, I couldn’t help buying it. What the hell. I figured that it might be good for Duncan, a tried and tested vetiver wearer, or if not, could be farmed off as one of the Christmas presents I must soon start amassing and packing off to England.
Later in the evening, after work that day, I happened to bump into a friend of mine at the train station, another Neil, not a perfume nut, but someone who does wear scent and who once texted me from some discount emporium in the city to ask me whether Calvin Klein Eternity For Men was an acceptable choice for a bloke ( I said yes; I used to wear it myself). As it turns out, it smells very good on him, though it has to be said that he might want to occasionally want to tone down the dosage (not that his coterie of Japanese females seem to mind..)
Dying to try out the Grey Vetiver, but loathe to let it touch my own skin (I simply can’t abide anything even the slightest bit ‘macho’ on myself, especially not in my black-suited work mode), Neil, always a very open-minded individual, was quite happy to have a couple of sprays of the scent on the back of his hands, and we spent the rest of the train journey together with the stylish aura of Grey Vetiver surrounding and encircling him most effectively; it smelled rich; velvety, dark, and rather sexy actually. But, still, most definitely for me at least, there was something a bit too poker-faced and self-serious; way too governor of the board. Neil agreed. In fact, he had never heard of vetiver oil, let alone Tom Ford, and, to my great delight, misheard the name of the perfume initially as ‘Tom Jones/ Grave Etiquette’, which made a strange kind of brilliant sense and made me almost spit out my drink. It was grave, especially on Neil, though not quite as hairy-chested as the great Welsh heartthrob himself………. ‘Ah yes’ he said; ‘It’s not unusual, but this is the stuff; classy; very teak-lined, executive boardroom; tailored suit; straight down to business; elegant”. Would he wear it, I asked? ‘Yes, just not all the time. Only when I need to impress.’
On Duncan it was the same : just way – once the lighter, more refreshing top notes had subsided – too conservative; prescribed, and straight in the drydown, too pointedly ‘virile’ : “It needs some sweetness or something” he said, and, on him, I agreed. There is no way I could have stood D smelling like that: so constricted, so self-consciously austere.
So that would have been that, had I not, the other day, ventured to try the perfume, just once, on myself – because how could I not if I was about to give it away, profligate though that sounds? Perhaps to Neil I thought, as we often meet by chance in the evenings, take the train together, and Grave Etiquette is a scent that I would quite happily have as our scented accompaniment. Or else I thought, maybe I could give it to my dad ( although somehow, come to think of it, he has quite enough executive confidence in him already and probably doesn’t need that aspect of his character accentuated). My mum would definitely have liked the classic, almost art deco design of the bottle though: quite often she has commandeered certain of my perfumes for that very reason, just to display in the downstairs bathroom. It was about to go in the post.
But I had to be sure. It’s not always easy to give away what you instinctively want to hoard. And so, quite bravely (I felt), I sprayed it on. And I braced myself for aggravation (nothing less conducive to my serenity than those thudding, aggressive, acrid male perfumes).
But…… wait a minute; taut, acidic, spice-laced, elegantly citric notes: nice (…..? ? …) A gorgeous vetiver heart, the kind of vetiver I really like; rich, deep, anchored; clean but with soul; fused, surreptiously, with nutmeg, pimiento, sage, and a gentle, rounding, powdery orris : the key, perhaps, to making this perfume settle, as it begins to, quite naturally and pleasingly as it does, onto my skin (……?!) Wow, I find myself saying to myself, amazed; I really quite like this; it could almost be my beloved Racine; surely this isn’t working on me, how bizarre. Yes, the Maître Parfumeur et Gantier vetiver is sharper, more lemony, with a plum note in the top that I love and that really clinches it, but Grey Vetiver is, somehow, similar: the warm, earthy, yet highly strung and supercilious kind of vetiver accord that I go for. And my skin always brings out the warmer notes in perfumes in any case, which is perhaps why I didn’t get the patrician, dark-browed authority that both Duncan and Neil gave off when donning this well-tempered mini meisterwerk. My goodness, I think, I really like this. Perhaps I had subconsciously been wanting a new vetiver I realize; had found my (long empty) Racine popping up into my smell brain again, craving a substitute.
“It suits you”, says Duncan, concurring quickly as I rush downstairs for a double check and inspection, just to make sure that I haven’t made some grave error and am about to go out the house smelling like Donald Rumsfeld. No, it really works, he assures me. And so the last two weeks, to my great surprise, I have been practically obsessed with Grey Vetiver, spraying it all over my sweaters and scarves; on my jeans, on my coat. I have already used up about a quarter of my bottle since I bought it, it is an ideal Autumn scent. The brutish ‘manliness’ I feared would be so harsh and overly apparent simply did not transpire; the perfume is masculine, but on me, pleasingly so, and just in the right measure ( and I know exactly what I measure I want in that regard). Admittedly, I did add a touch of Shalimar on a couple of occasions – which I find, strangely, usually works very well with vetivers, as it contains a subliminal vetiver note in its base – just to plump out the overall effect of the scent when going out; but in any case, the hoped for compliments came quickly after, I felt good and very natural in it all day (nice lasting power as well), and I think that Grey Vetiver is now destined to become one of my go-to scents, my staples. I rarely feel this immediately comfortable in a scent, this happy and confident just spraying with abandon. I love how it smells on my clothes, on my skin, in the air around me.
Me, in Tom Ford. Who knew?
Filed under Flowers
VINTAGE BAL A VERSAILLES: AN AERIAL SHOT
The first time I encountered Bal a Versailles was in Luca Turin’s original Le Guide from 1992. There is something in reading about a perfume that you think that you will never be able to get your hands on that almost makes it more enjoyable: the thrill of the holy grail; the abstract, luscious taunting of the unreachable and unattainable. I can see myself poring over his reviews again and again, dreaming and yearning, trying to prise apart his spare, poetic French, his enticing yet hermetically sealed descriptions of long lost perfumes by Molyneux, Jacomo, Revillon, of the just opened Shiseido Palais Royal, of dozens of delectable sounding perfumes I would probably never smell in the future and just feel my internal organs clenching up with intense longing; an almost masochistic craving that was acutely pleasurable even when unfulfilled. His cunning words painted sufficiently salivating, impressionistic pictures to gloriously pique my curiosity and vainly try to imagine how this legendary perfume, the famous Bal A Versailles, must actually smell.
In his review of this scent, if I remember correctly (it has been some years), there was, naturally, a fantastical, extravagant ball; the richly dressed revellers close and thronging; splendorously bedecked: and our heroine, barefoot, dancing feistily and libidinously near the feast’s kitchens, oblivious to protocol and convention, under a sky lit up respendently with fireworks. Turin touched brilliantly on the tightrope walk between glittering, sun-god richesse and glaring vulgarity in his descriptions, and make no mistake about it, Bal A Versailles does have a huge thwack of the vulgar, dolloped adoringly in its glowing, syruped, accords: it is lurid, sweaty, thick with those oily, glinting floral paints of liquorous orange blossom, rose absolutes, and pissy, indolic jasmine essences; all glinted and carnivaled up even further with notes of rosemary and mandarin, of lemon and of lilac; a riot; a mess of gilded lacquer to hide what we then know full well is about to come – that base: the sandalwood, vetiver, patchouli, castoreum; the resins, the benzoin and tolu balsam; the vanilla, the musks, but most of all the civet, the lick of a thriving, voluptuous tongue on the neck, the tiny, ensensitized, golden hairs shivering with anticipation of what is about to come if she can just slip quietly away from those dastardly crowds….away from the mirrored magnificence, the powdered perruques; the politesse and refinement; and into the arms of the bestial, nourishing pleasures to be had in the shadows behind the beckoning marquee; lace-ripping throats thrust down hungrily on grass. Flesh, and lavish: full, greedy kisses.
Yes, Luca Turin knew full well that this perfume is certainly verging on the tacky, on the grotesque even, but that it is also irrevocably majestic and sumptuous. Its turgid, engorged elegance does not give a fig about standard, common decency, but is more a perfume for those who live for hedonism and the fleshly, epicurean pleasures. An aristocratic vulgarity, then – knowingly fun and ribald; regal, radiant and jasmined, but equally, filthily indecorous.
*
*
When I first then came across a vintage parfum of Bal A Versailles at a fleamarket (in vaporisateur form; somehow the most intensive experience one can have of this perfume, with all the notes blocked together so handsomely), having been ravished by the base notes I of course then wanted to know more, and looking among all the blogs, discovered some brilliant reviews that if you are interested in finding more about this rightfully much loved cult scent, you simply must read. The Non-Blonde encapsulates its essence most perfectly, and coincidentally invokes one of my favourite films, Kubrick’s Eyes Wide Shut in the process to contextualize the masked, sordid orgies of the perfume’s base, the frank and unapologizing eros at its heart. Like me, she believes that there is a right time and wrong time for this perfume; you really have to get it right : on dirty skin and in summer I would rather die, seriously: in winter, especially in snow, after a long hot bath with candles and the right soaps; perfect, warm, clean skin, letting the parfum sink in slowly into your chemistry, and, in my own case, possibly topping it all with talcs, just because; to lock it in nicely like a she-wolf under glass; lying, patiently, like a dandy in my bathrobe, waiting for this perfume’s slow, rich, magic to take effect……..When I do this, and have judiciously chosen the right time to wear her; when I walk out into the icy, wintery night and feel the eskimo furred, languorous and purring warmth of the vanillic ambers rising up subtlely and slowly from my skin, a burnished nuzzling halo of secrets and longings, loving, three dimensional, alive, I sometimes think that there is no better perfume on this earth.
I am not alone. Another seminal review of Bal A Versailles that I have read many a time was by one Beth on Perfume Smellin Things, an almost uncomfortably passionate account of how this perfume defined a tumultuous love affair that almost destroyed her, but which ultimately, now, only gives extra symbolism to a perfume she loves more than any other: a private, engorging triumph of a scent that she says is her, that encompasses all she is. This is a must-read. You can smell her affair in this piece. It is raw and dark, erotic, and quite emotionally wrenching. Yet as much as I love this smell and must always have some in my collection, I could never feel the same as this writer: it is simply too complex, embroiled; too basically disgusting for me to have as my signature. It would be like subsisting solely on truffes and chocolate ganaches. It would be sickening. And yet when I find it on the cheap here in Japan, always exciting as I love the box and bottle (why is there so much of this stuff here? It seems like the last place on earth where such a perfume would be acceptable?) I often buy it, whether to give it to others, or to wear by myself once the temperatures drop enough for it to feel right. It is not an easy perfume to just leave there on the shelf. Too precious. A treasure. Yet as I keep saying, get it wrong, as I did on Saturday night when I just wanted to scrub myself down in a citric, lemony shower and felt embarrassed to be out in public (particularly with Duncan in an uncharacteristic overdose of Jicky parfum), you end up regretting it all night, as those sour, pungent indoles and curdling, animalic florals begin to slowly eat you alive like starving leopards at the circus. Get it right, though, and it is animalic perfection, like being consumed, and seduced, by a beautiful, heavy breathing panther.
And speaking of beasts, there is one other review that is absolutely essential, one of the funniest I have ever read. Perfume Posse was always amusing in any case, but the review of Bal A Versailles on there is quite hilarious, collating all the splayed-open, beastly horror stories in one, rip-roaring go. Needless to say, despite the bawdy humour and the scatalogical jokes; the talk of cat butts and horse dung; of indoles and foulness; all those who rant and rave about this perfume on that forum do say that, ultimately, when all is said and done, that despite, and because, of its glistening over-complexity, its richness and filth; its unsuitablity for polite society – a perfume you must keep as a private, guilty secret, a perfume to scandalize even yourself – they absolutely love it.
And so do I.
Filed under Flowers
image2.jpg

Jean Desprez Bal A Versailles vintage edt and parfum: the gunkiest, most viscous, floral, musked, vanillic amber the world has ever known. In Japan, tossed into bargain bins for five and ten dollars apiece. exquisite, if mightily, naughtily precarious…. get it wrong and you smell like a skunk. Get it right and smell like the Marquis De Sade gone to heaven
STOP THE PRESS! AFTELIER PERFUMES’ CUIR DE GARDENIA EXTRAIT IS GORGEOUS
but my computer is broken and I am trying to write this on my iPhone and I can tell you, with the devil incarnate that is autocorrect, plus my aubergine fingers, that writing is NO fun ( this I literally my eighth attempt).
the perfume, just deliciously arrived in my postbox: immediately, for me, knee weakening. not gardenia, as in gardenia, but plumeria; tiare: a tropical, moist, neptunian, sultry white witch emerging, hair slicked to shoulders, from the sea. sweet Italian bubble bath honey. cuir: but fresh.tango’s eminently wearable younger sister, unencumbered
Filed under Flowers
D A M A G E
The brilliant, gloriously fun new Lady Gaga album, Artpop, is a magnificent, brain-mangling opus so infernally catchy, that when I am not dancing like a dervish around the kitchen or up and down the stairs, my head is so gloriously full to the bursting with hooks, synth bursts and choruses that I can’t even think straight let alone sit down and write about perfume
Filed under Flowers
O sweet fig : FLAGRANT DELICE by TERRY DE GUNZBURG (2012) (+ miniature figathon for Nina: L’Artisan Parfumeur Premier Figuier; Diptyque Philosokos; Miller Harris Figue Amere; Angela Flanders Figue Noire; Sonoma Scent Studio Fig Tree; Carthusia Io Capri )
updated figginess for a cold november day
Filed under Flowers
LOVE ON A CAROUSEL: DELIRIA by L’ARTISAN PARFUMEUR (2013)
When I was fourteen I went on a French exchange to the town of Moulins in central France. It was my first time abroad, and you might say that I was almost delirious with excitement. After a whistle stop tour of the sights and sounds of Paris, my fellow classmates and I found ourselves plunged, directly and fully, into the culture of the country I had been dreaming about for so long. We arrived by train, and were soon paired off (a bit scarily I felt, for ones so young); shacked up with our pen pals and their families for a week. Escargots, cooked in garlic and slimy butter for dinner (yuk! I can still feel them sliding around in my mouth); petits pois, “vinaigrette”, it all just seemed so weird, slightly terrifying, and wonderful to an over-excited, easily stimulated, and very Francophile ‘budding linguist’ such as myself. Cela m’a beaucoup plu.
One of the highlights of that holiday, I remember, was a trip to the fairground, where my crush, a cute girl with braces called Laetitia, was all eyes, and so was I, and the sweet aromas hanging on the air, different, but familiar (is the rush of the fairground not universal?) were such a thrill. I always loved such places in England as well; the sugared clash of the cold, Yuleish wintry air and the tantalizing, caramelized steam that hung in nimbulus streams on the zingy atmosphere of Saturday night; the mischievousness of the dodgem cars, when you would deliberately bump and crash some giggling, hapless victims into hilarious mercy; that sadness – always out there, waiting in bushes – coated in pink and yellow, sugar glazed delight. And upon smelling this mood-lifting oddity by L’Artisan Parfumeur the other day ( Bertrand Duchaufour at his most playful), I was lifted out of my moment and plunged back, dreamily, into that world of fun, love, and French sweets: those rule-rubbing days when afternoons bled into evenings and the fair came to town: the cold, deep-pocketed frissons you felt at the clown-terror lurking at the concreted edges of the park; the lure of strangers; the dangers in those wild, mechanized rides.
“Prepare to be thrilled”, says L’Artisan. “Your senses will be shaken into a delicious blur”. Well, I wouldn’t perhaps go quite that far, but Déliria, part of a new set of three perfumes called ‘Explosions D’Emotions’, is certainly a bit of light-hearted fun in this often po-faced world of perfumery, and it did put a smile on my face. Composed, apparently, of ‘dizzying’ accords of candy floss; toffee apple; ‘metallic notes’ and rhum, the most memorable theme of this perfume is, I would say however, the fantastically vivid top note of pineapple that bursts out at you from first go from the bottle, like one of those sticky, sugary and creamy pineapple cakes from Braggs the Bakers that my auntie Val is so addicted to.
Pineappled, phantasm dodgem cars scrape and spark with laughing electricity; music speakers boom with the gullible, teenage sweetness of surging, pubescent enthusiasms: love blooms, and Kia Ora – Orange & Pineapple flavour – is slurped greedily through stripey, twisty, plastic straws. L’ananas, musing with artificial flavouring, a child-loving burst of taste; of yellowy, custardish vanilla swirling before your eyes as candy floss stings, sweetly, the late November air…
Just like the clumsy, ardent first fumblings of youth though, the stamina and performance here, are, sadly however, not awe-inspiring. Soon, once the deliria have faded (and they always do…) we find a more prosaic, uglier, tail-end of steel and santaloids, rather than the soft and cheek-pinching vanilla that we were yearning for (…. were those kisses not meant to last?) We can’t help noticing, suddenly, the rust and rudders of those ageing dodgem cars scratching the ride’s dirty floors: for the first time in a good few hours we look at our watches.
Yes, it’s a shame that it couldn’t last. As they say, after love, omne animal triste est. But who can really complain, honestly, when those first spurts – of fruits, and rum, of fairground thrills, and sweet, vanillic things – feel so spontaneous, so joyful?
Filed under Flowers



























