http://nypost.com/2015/05/07/japans-crying-hotel-is-cheaper-than-a-shrink/
Monthly Archives: May 2015
FLORABELLIO by DIPTYQUE (20I5)
I have always had an instinctive yearning for the tropics. In hot places by the ocean, things always feel more relaxing: solid, yet dream-like, more deathless and drowsing, and any perfume that thus reminds me of this sensation of heat and-leaden heaviness, of the torpor of flowers in the afternoon as waves glitter fantastically on the beach, is immediately attractive to me.
I love the sun, and the smell of salt water on skin. The mulch of the dark wet sand at the base of oceanic stems: that strange, overripe smell when the day is at its hottest and the vegetation tilts into a lassitude and sea creatures hide in their shells.
There are several curious perfumes I have smelled that have aspects of this odd, sea-organic facet, fragrances that veer away from the classic ‘beach’ smell of tropical flowers and coconut oil and trespass into more risk-taking zones of perfumery where strangeness is an essential part of the structure. Aftelier’s Tango springs to mind first of course, with its peculiar but compelling central note of roasted sea shells and champaca, but there is also the rotting beauty of the animalic, marine Manoumalia by Les Nez and its floral centre of pua kenikeni, equally perturbing in its evocations of places, cultures and smells that are zones beyond our own. No perfume of this genre, however, comes close in beauty to the almost Botticellian, lustful and Venus-like strangeness that is Jean Jacques Brosseau’s rare Ombre Bleue Parfum (which I found a pristine bottle of recently in Kamakura and which I am planning to do a full review of soon. This is a beautiful perfume; erotic yet clear and dew-fresh, like swimming naked in the blue grotto in Capri ).
Other areas of the oceanic spectrum covered in contemporary perfumery include Hermès’ recent Epice Marine: a sea-doused curiosity that melds quite nutty, anti-intuitive notes of burnt spices and savoury flavours with a fresh, oceanic calone top note to interesting (if puzzling) effect, while last year’s Eau Mohéli took quite an innovative approach to the beach-side floral by trying a full 360° snapshot of a sub-equatorial ylang ylang tree, a ‘solar’ portrait of the flower that including its roots, its twigs, and its leaves in the midday sun.
The new Florabellio by Diptyque is also in the family of perfumes that not only evoke the freshness of waves but also the flora and fauna swimming below. Unlike more intensely algaeish perfumes such as Profumi Del Forte’s Tirrenico, though, Florabellia is a light, commercial summer perfume that only hints at these things, but is nevertheless still somewhat troubling. Like other calone-centred perfumes I have considered buying for the hot summer months here such as Aria Di Mare by Il Profumo (fresh; Adriatic) or Montale’s intriguingly ozonic Sandflowers (dazzling sea, and rocks, and baked sand), Florabellio is almost overinsistently fresh up top with its oceanic, salted note combined with sea fennel – a familiar combination in marine fragrances – plus an approximation of ‘apple blossom’ and osmanthus that gives the sea breezes a floral airiness which works quite enticingly as the initial top accord fades gradually into place and the perfume’s true originality then becomes apparent: an oddness lying in the unexpected, and possibly clashing, heart notes of coffee, and roasted sesame. Notes that were not, by any means, obvious on first smelling (and I don’t think I could have identified those particular ingredients if I’m honest); but there is, nevertheless, something most definitely something slightly jarring, yet also addictive, in these notes resting under the freshness that made me think of the scent that sun exposed sea plants give off when you pass them half-mindedly strolling along a sand dune, sensing intuitively the darkness and moisture, those life-teeming eco-systems of microscopic organisms that live beneath their solar-baked surface.
During the day that I was wearing Florabellio, this central note was the one thing that put me off the perfume while also the very thing that drew me to it: the pleasing illusion of sea-ness and clear-cliffed panoramas would keep bringing me closer, but then this almost dirty, animalish inner accord would bite my nose and I’d think no I can’t. It was the same on the scent strips that I left lying about; the floral, oceanic salt accord stronger and more tenacious that you might expect a perfume like this to be, the tension between the flowers and sea salt in the top, and the seemingly random addition of coffee and sesame in the heart creating an unusual aura whose perplexing and vexing qualities I couldn’t quite put my finger on. Compared to most recent commercial releases, though, this release is undeniably memorable, for me at least, and one of those fragrances you are not sure you could ever quite commit to, but cannot totally let go of either. Florabellio is a scent I can imagining being more and more taken with, actually, when the sun really starts to get powerful in the coming sweltering months; when I get dragged into the sweating exhaustion of the summer term, and start dreaming, heavily, of tropical escapes.
Filed under Flowers
PATRICK SUSKIND’S PERFUME BECOMES A REALITY
According to an article I read in the newspaper the other day, it seems that it will soon be possible, at a price, to bottle the scent of our loved ones. Our deceased, dead, loved ones.
A French fragrance company has devised a way to steep their scent – from clothes, their pillows and sheets they have slept in – extract the unique smell; and capture that fragrance, peculiar to the person alone, in a perfume.
I’m not quite sure how I feel about this. We all know how searingly evocative smell (and perfume) can be in its associative power to bring a person momentarily back to life or make the absent present – and I of course understand perfectly how the poignant smell of an unwashed item of clothing, or a used and unlaundered pillow case could be heart-piercingly painful when inhaled in a moment of grief: the desire to thus keep that smell for as long as possible; the knowledge that this physical remnant of a person will inevitably fade. But yet: the idea of this very private odour being recreated in liquid form for bespoke, commercial purposes (a bottle of your loved one will go for around six hundred dollars) still strikes me as somewhat macabre. It is ethically sound? Would the departed person necessarily have wanted these private smells to be exposed to these strangers?
To me, the concept is mortifying. Perhaps to some extent, my uncomfortable reaction to the thought of being ‘bottled’ is the idea of wondering what particular smell that exists in this teeming mass of cells and bacteria I call my physical self would be ‘captured’ ( I admit that the idea sickens me). Do we, in fact, only have one odour? Could I bear to have that unadorned smell analyzed; reconstituted; and packaged by women and men in white coats?
The unpleasant fact remains, for instance, that my own bedtime pillow is never especially fragrant. You might even say that it stinks. We live in a very humid country, and especially in summer, when I sweat, and it dries, and I sweat, and it dries (I am allergic to air conditioning so it has to be au naturel, and I don’t have the time for daily washing) and Duncan really starts wrinkling his nose, would he then want a parfum de toilette of that stench bestowed upon him in the funeral lounge in the event of my demise as an extremely expensively scented memento (and what would it then be called? ‘Dog In A Swamp?’) The sour-sweat smell of a stressed-out day?; the smell of my bath robe; the sickly aura when I’ve had bronchitis?
The hero of Patrick Süskind’s ‘Perfume’, Grenouille, was obsessed to the point of complete insanity with the odour of a flame-haired maiden in Paris that he scented one fine day on the air, a smell that so possessed him and maddened him that he had no choice at all but to kill her. White skinned. Beautiful. A virgin. A young girl whose natural body scent so entranced him that he eventually, after abducting her, succeeded in immortalizing her in liquid by enfleuraging her murdered corpse in fat until she had exuded every last drop of her natural essence and he could wear it himself as an elixir; an extrait, a scent so disorientatingly beautiful that he was then consumed and torn to shreds by the crowd. She was an unblemished angel, however, and I fear, that my own enfleuraged natural odour would not quite be up to this level of exquisite, instinctive refinement.
If I could be bottled at my very best, say post-bath; dressed in clean cotton, no deodorant; a walk in the sun for a couple of hours – that smell maybe I wouldn’t mind so much and it would certainly be representative of something. I don’t hate my birthday suit smell in the right conditions, particularly when sun-kissed and happy; horny and free. But even if this particular smell, which certainly isn’t present all the time, were ‘perfected’, would this still really bring me back for people who wanted to remember me? Are we that simplistic?
It’s hard to know if this venture, about to become reality in September, reeks of true compassion or whether there is an element of exploitation: the commodification of something that perhaps we should take with us to the grave. Of ‘perfumes’, kept alive unnaturally, as haunting, and literal liquid ghosts.
And while the idea of these ‘perfumes’ is fascinating (if somewhat sinister), and I do definitely want to know more about the project, as I can see very clearly that the possibility of even the smallest olfactory glimpse of a person you miss keenly and would do anything to bring back could bring solace in some ways to the bereaved in the darkest moments of despair, at the same time, looking at it in a different way, couldn’t the virtual presence of that person conjured in that way through smell also bring only more torment? The cruel semblance of their corporeal realness, taunting you in the dark?
Even if the true olfactive memory of this person you have lost were kept alive to some extent in its rawness, in its almost pitiable humanity (the smell of hair always makes me feel this way), would you really want that person, in any case, to be reduced, concentrated, to just one intimate, bodily, smell? Could this not, in fact disrupt, almost corrupt even, the complicated beauty of their memory?
For its complexity, its romance, its commingling with a person’s natural smell and spirit, its ability to ignite the heart’s passions when linked to anyone we have known and loved, I know I love perfume, and I am pretty sure that I myself would rather not have this strange, creepy new extraction process done to me (and I would sign a legal order saying the same). At my funeral viewing, if you happen to be present, there may be a selection of perfumes on display to peruse, mull over, and you can see if any of them do the trick. To see if I am brought to life even just slightly. If not, you can just sigh along to Kate Bush.
You will not be given the opportunity, however, to inhale the smell of my socks; my earwax; or my suit.
Those smells, and others I will have accrued in the meantime, I will be taking with me.
Filed under Flowers
NARCISSE NOIR by CARON (I9II)
Narcisse Noir is to Caron what Shalimar is to Guerlain, or Nº5 to Chanel : the perfume upon which the house’s fortune was first established, that made its name, and that subsequently became a legend in perfumed history.
The destinies of these three very diverse creations were not to be similar.While Shalimar’s timeless vanillic beauty still feels relevant, purring and sexy, and N°5 – a beautiful, shimmering, and feminine creation – is still relentlessly promoted as the juggernaut that powered Chanel and one of the world’s bestsellers even to this day, Narcisse Noir, a shadowed and exotic creation, has completely faded into obscurity, known only to perfumisti, those who have worn it for a lifetime, and the dwindling number of people who still frequent the dusty old Caron boutiques on the Avenue Montaigne in Paris or New York’s Lexington Avenue.
Despite the very particular beauty of this perfume, it not difficult to understand why it would have faded from favour. Narcisse Noir simply smells of another age and time; of boudoirs, dressing rooms, heavy velvet drapes and black lace and crinoline; of dark colonial exploits and influence – I have always felt that this perfume smells very Indian – and, more importantly perhaps, a different kind of sensuality: this is not, by any means, a perfume made to seduce in the traditional light and floral manner by being virginalized, fluttering, and coy. Rather, the vintage parfum and eau de parfum of Narcisse Noir are, comparatively, mannish and challenging; deep,solidly assured: the erotic aggressive to your passive.
Essentially, this sunless, stygian floral is a rich narcissus/boisé/animale blend, based, so it is claimed, on an essence of Persian black narcissus, a prominent, citrus-glinted, tainted orange blossom, and heavy, civet-touched sandalwood and vetiver over the classic Ernst Daltroff mousse de saxe base, the musty and antique-smelling sediment in many classic Caron perfumes that is, in my view, the reason that these perfumes, though compelling, now simply seem too old fashioned to the average modern consumer.
This depends though. Nao, the dancer seen standing next to Duncan in my piece on Sunday night’s shenanigans, The Soft Touch, was immediately quite intrigued by this perfume when I offered it to her; an instant reaction of hai, this has fukami, depth, and definite fuinki- (atmosphere): she could feel the history and the stories rising up from it from one inhalation and I love it when certain perfumes gain such a reaction, suggesting their intrinsic appeal and beauty, no matter that they are over a century old.
In fact, the versions of this perfume I have – one particular vintage extrait and an eau de cologne ( whose box’s motif forms the header on this blog, along with a fresh narcissus flower from our garden – there was never going to be any other name for this website: narcissus, hyacinth and f*** being my three favourite words in the English language) – are not anywhere near as potent or as impressive as the bottle of Narcisse Noir I remember my friend Claire having at Cambridge: an eau de parfum that was wonderfully dense, compressed and above all, really definitively sultry in its strength and sillage: I once took her bottle when she wasn’t looking and heavily sprayed the inside of my flute case with it (which later became embarrassing when I would then have to open it at the trio practice I used to do at a baroque recorder cafe just down the hill from where we live – the smell lingered for years).
It was bewitching, though, this scent – the oil of jonquil interwoven with that malingering orange blossom and narcissus, but always, always with that plush dark carpet of animalic woods and musks underlining it that smelled like the smoke of Indian incense. It was a perfume that made you wonder, that drew you in even as it scared, and I can imagine it having been enormously seductive in the smoky atmospheres into which it debuted all those bygone decades ago, when the perfume was so current and successful that Caron could compete with Coty and his like in America; Caron’s big perfume: the scent of Gloria Swanson’s tragic Norma Desmond in Billy Wilder’s Sunset Boulevard.
And on the subject of film, is this not in fact also the drowsy perfume that becomes the fatal undoing of the nuns in Black Narcissus, Powell & Pressburger’s brilliantly high-nerved thriller from I947, set vertiginously up in the Himalayan mountains; that strange-pitched and hysterical film about a group of sisters cloistered on a cliff-side convent, unravelling as warm, perturbing and sensuous winds form a mind-turning constant and the nuns’ precarious religious conviction gradually comes undone through their contact with the locals and the presence of men?
Is not perfume itself, in this masterpiece, the catalyst that leads to eventual madness and death as well as ecstatic liberation? Scent is the unavoidable presence that insinuates and lodges itself into the minds of these susceptible women on the fateful day that an Indian prince – almost impossibly sweet and pure of intention – enters the convent for English instruction – always in sumptuous jewels and white robes – and provides distraction from God. But it is his perfume – called Black Narcissus – that forms not only the title of the film, but also, seemingly, the central component that makes the nuns succumb to their vulnerable humanity and to the elements, the scent of his perfume emanating serenely but disconcertingly from his handkerchieves and making them then unable to think clearly.
Can this perfume not be seen as Caron’s Narcisse Noir itself? The direct translation of the French from the name of such a famous perfume seems much too obvious to be a coincidence, even as it gains an extra magic layer in its starker, Anglicized transformation. Surely they are one and the same, and indeed, this perfume does really smell wonderful on a man: swarthy, royal; elegantly poised. I can imagine how the nuns must have felt when he walked into the room. Duncan, dressed as Echo on Sunday night, trying desperately to distance Narcissus from his mirrors; the gentle swathes of Narcisse Noir drifting from his person; and me,’The Black Narcissus’ in the audience, looking, reacting; inhaling him.
Filed under Narcissus
TOKYO BULLET REVIEW # 1: THE NEW DIOR : FEVE DELICIEUSE (2015)
Just meeting a friend in Shinjuku and thought I’d pop into Isetan, navigating the snooty maidens and looking for something new or interesting.
I don’t really like any of the Dior Prives, but ‘Delicious Bean’ comes perhaps the closest. A pleasing, if over buttered ( and HORRIBLY overpriced ) tonka/ cacao / vanilla that is quite rich, smooth, and edible and certainly worth a sniff if you like the gourmand type and need a new addition ( though I personally prefer the bitterer edge of Guerlain’s Tonka Imperiale).
Nice enough then, yes.
But nothing to get your knickers in a twist over.
Filed under Flowers


























