ROCHAS MYSTERE (1978)

On first look it could be any of the 80’s Rochas round bottled editions : Madame Rochas; Byzance; Lumiere – all of which are gorgeous perfumes. In fact, it turned out to be a particularly pristine edition of Mystere (less strange – you might even say sinister) than the dark soiled silvery murk that was housed in the asymmetrical original 70’s bottles I own; a smoother, more wearably smooth ambered version (this is the edp) that on this October Monday feels edgy and atmospheric – but soothingly perfect.

Excuse the absence!

My original review of Mystere:

8 Comments

Filed under Flowers

8 responses to “ROCHAS MYSTERE (1978)

  1. And just like that — he is back! Thank you for getting what looks to be a monstrous slog of a week off to a heady start. Query: is there a fragrance produced in the 1970s that doesn’t look especially winning posed on a piece of fur?

    • !

      A good point. When in doubt, whip up the fur.

      Do you know this one btw ?

      And thanks for having me despite my failing to reply to various things – I have been all over the place as usual.

  2. Tora

    I’ve missed you. Love from the mountains of Colorado.

  3. Filomena

    No problem, as I have been absent as well. The only perfumes I wear now are what I already own, which are all most vintage. I am not buying anything new.

  4. Robin

    Just had this instinct to see if you were up to anything and BAM: you’re here!! My lucky day!

    Mystere. Yes, that bottle looks good on fur. Good instincts, dear N. I’ve always put it in the same company as the Weil compositions made to be fur-coat-friendly (as befits a former furrier): Zibeline, et al. (I would *love* to get my paws on a bottle of Chinchilla. I’ve never sniffed it. Have you?) This is perfect Mystere weather, when everything in the garden is past its prime and the scents from outside are heading towards the sous bois. Simpatico.

  5. Robin

    Great original review, btw!

Leave a Reply